Now the Supreme Court of Brazil has accused Sergio Moro of being biased towards Lula

The Supreme Federal Court of Brazil estimated this Tuesday March 23 that the former judge Sergio Moro he was partial judging the former president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva Yes overturned Lava Jato’s conviction.

Vote in the second chamber of Supreme Federal Court ended three to two with the key minister’s vote Carmen Lúcia Antunes, who changed his position compared to the 2018 vote, when the analysis of a habeas corpus presented by Lula denounces the law in the eight-year prison sentence linked to a apartment in Guarujá spa, Sao Paulo, By which he was imprisoned 580 days. With this decision, the investigation against Lula you have to start from scratch.

Lava Jato: who is the hacker who leaked private talks about the operation

On March 8, the magistrate Edson Fachin quashed all convictions imposed by the federal judge of Paraná on the former president considering that Moro had no legal power because the procedures should have been tried in Brasilia and not in Curitiba. With this decision, Lula da Silva has regained his political rights.

After this new decision, the Federal Supreme Court deals another blow to the Lava Jato case since other defendants could make similar presentations, arguing that Moro was biased.

In this case, the judges voted in favor of Lula Gilmar Mendes, Ricardo Lewandowski and Carmen Lúcia Antunes, who changed his position although requested that this decision not be extended to all other convicts by Lava Jato.

Lava Jato: the most important politicians and businessmen involved in the corruption scandal

For his part, he voted against Fachin, who had canceled the sentences, and also Cassio Nunes Brands, the magistrate appointed by Bolsonaro who defended Moro’s right to defense.

The judges who accepted the habeas corpus they understood that Moro had committed illegalities in the instruction of the process, using arbitrary and until phone jab from the former president’s team of lawyers. The the case returns to page zero and another investigation needs to be determined.

EuDr