[ad_1]
Raphael Samuel lives in Mombai, India. He is 27 years old and has an unusual idea: he intends to sue his parents for bringing him into this world without his prior consent.
"I love my parents and we have excellent relationships, but they have me for their pleasure and enjoyment." My life is wonderful, but I do not see why I should bring another life to the world and submit it to the questions of life and looking for a job, especially when it has not asked me to do it. To exist, "said Samuel at the Indian site
L & # 39; print
In the same spirit, the young man from Mombai sent a message to the children of his country: "I want to tell you that you owe nothing to your parents".
Although Samuel's look at the relationship between parents and children seems somewhat delusional, he's not alone in his position. There is a movement that shares the same perspective of this young man called anti-natalism.
Antinatalists do not have bad dispositions towards children or life, but simply believe that the creature who has not given their consent to life should not be born. In other words, if a child does not agree with his birth – as well as life's difficulties – he is not allowed to give birth to it.
The voluntary movement of human extinction
Samuel is part of a growing "childless" community that calls itself the Voluntary Movement for Human Extinction (MVEH), which argues that children should not be brought into the world.
This movement shares his ideas in
Nihilanand, their Facebook page, where they post messages such as "your parents have had instead of having a toy or a dog", "you are their entertainment" or "a good father pbaded the Child before their desires and needs, but the child is in itself a wish of the father ".
In another Nihilanand article, it is written, "If a father really knows what is good for his children, why did he have it?" There is also an extreme claim: "Procreation is the supreme act of evil."
Pratima Naik, a 28-year-old Indian woman who is also part of the Paren movement to make babies, said the move was "totally voluntary and non-violent." "We do not want to impose our convictions on anyone, but more people have to wonder why having a child at that time is not fair," he said.
Among the reasons to follow this trend, the young woman mentioned avoiding the social mandate of becoming a parent, relieving the Earth's resources and reducing the large number of children waiting for adoption.
.
[ad_2]
Source link