A prognosis shakes the British media: “The British monarchy could disappear in two generations”

The British royalty, over 1,000 years old, could end in two generationsWriter Hilary Mantel said in an interview published on Saturday.

The current monarchy in the UK extends its roots to at least William the Conqueror, who invaded England in 1066, but he also claims to have ties to the mosaic of kingdoms and principalities that spanned what has become England, Scotland and Wales long before that. .dates.

Mantel, best known for her “Wolf Hall” trilogy which followed the rise of blacksmith’s son Thomas Cromwell to become Prime Minister of Henry VIII and then recounts his downfall and execution, said she admired the dedication of Queen Elizabeth II at 95, and her heir Charles, the Prince of Wales.

“I think they do it as well as anyone could, take it as seriously as anyone couldMantel, 69, told the newspaper The temperature.

But when asked how long he thought the monarchy was gone, Mantel told The Times his estimate was only two generations. “It’s very difficult to understand the thinking behind the monarchy in the modern world when people are seen simply as celebrities,” he said.

If your point of view is correct, Elizabeth’s great-grandson, prince george, 8 years old – the third in order of succession to the throne after his grandfather Carlos, 72, and his father, Prince William, 39 – would not become king.

Mantel sparked controversy in Britain earlier this month when he told La Repubblica that England was now a decaying place based on “the memory of power”. He described Brexit supporters as inexperienced and often ridiculous opportunists.

“I would like people to stop screaming and start listening to each other,” he said of the UK. “I think in this country, right now, it would be a change that could save us.”

Although polls suggest that a clear majority of Britons continue to support the monarchy and above all respect and admire the Queen, a May poll showed young Britons would now prefer an elected head of state..

A spokesperson for Buckingham Palace declined to comment.

Minimize the size of the royal family

Whether or not Mantel’s forecasts are met, When Prince Charles, 72, becomes king, he will limit the number of official members.

The decree issued by King George V in 1917 limits the titles of prince and princess to the children of the monarch, their children and the eldest grandson of the Prince of Wales, who in this case is Prince George, son of Prince William.

Prince George received the title automatically, while the other sons of Guillaume –Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis – received their titles from Queen Elizabeth II, which issued a new patent for this purpose in 2013.

When Carlos takes the throne, Archie, Harry’s eldest son, would deserve this honor, with which would come privileges such as an allowance from the Crown budget. and state security. However, for years there has been talk of the future king’s intention to minimize the size of the royal family, convinced that the citizens are not ready to pay for an overpopulated monarchy.

In this way, the royal family would officially only be made up of the sovereign, the direct heirs to the throne and their relatives. According to a recent report by Daily mail, Carlos is ready to change the 1917 rulebook and so he let the Sussexes know.

“Harry and Meghan have been informed that Archie will never be a prince, even when Charles is crowned king.” a source linked to the couple told the newspaper. Other insiders assured the post that it left the Sussexes furious. “Carlos never concealed that he wanted a reduced monarchy when he became king.”

Lilibet, the newborn daughter of the Sussexes, would also not receive the title of princess.

Prince Charles’ supposed new decision to downsize the royal family, if he does not abdicate in favor of his son William, transcends at a difficult time Windsor’s relationship with the Sussexes

(With information from Reuters)

KEEP READING: