Abortion: Resisted Texas Rights Restriction Comes Into Force | A rule reduces the access time to the practice



[ad_1]

At Texas entered into force on Wednesday a law that prohibits abortion from the first six weeks of gestation, in the midst of a great controversy because the Supreme Court had to decide to arrest him with a precautionary measure. It’s practically a total ban, the most restrictive that has existed in the United States since the famous “Roe v. Wade ”, this legal battle fought in 1973 before the highest North American court which paved the way in this country for the legalization of voluntary termination of pregnancy. talking about a woman with a normal menstrual cycle will only be two weeks late. In most cases, women do not know at this time that they are pregnant.», He warned Page 12 lawyer Paula Ávila-Guillén, Executive Director of the Women’s Equality Center, an organization working in the United States for human rights and equity. In a witch-hunt tone, the rule offers rewards to those who report their violation.

The law was promoted in May by Texas Gov. Republican Greg Abbott and approved by the state’s Congress, also a Republican majority.. But it doesn’t just ban abortion beyond the sixth week of gestation. In addition, explained vila-Guillén, “it has a component that is extremely worrying and reminds me a lot of what is happening in El Salvador, after the entry into force of the total ban on abortion in this American country. power plant in 98: Texas law states that anyone can sue a doctor or clinic if they suspect an abortion after that date. And the person who asks can receive up to $ 10,000 in reward for reporting and helping to comply with the law”.

Since its approval in May, various presentations have been made to the Supreme Court to intervene to prevent its entry into force, with a precautionary measure, at least until the merits of the case are discussed. But the highest court has not been issued so far. I could do it later.

“This settlement puts more than six million women, mostly Latinas, who live in Texas, a state with high levels of poverty, in a very difficult situation because they will not be able to access abortion after 6 years. first weeks of pregnancy, ”warned the lawyer, specializing in sexual and reproductive rights.

– Why do you compare this new regulatory context with the situation in El Salvador? -I ask him Page 12.

Although in the case of El Salvador, when the law is changed and the absolute ban on abortion comes into effect, there is no economic incentive to report those who violate it, if there is a order from the Ministry of Health (as well as the Attorney General’s Office) saying that abortions are a crime and that all health professionals have an obligation to report it. What we have seen in El Salvador is that any obstetric emergency, such as a spontaneous miscarriage, becomes suspect. Then, doctors, nurses, guards, neighbors, started to denounce the women. And that means in El Salvador, women who suffered spontaneous pregnancy loss cannot prove that it happened to them and they immediately become criminals, which can happen in Texas. It is very disturbing. Women’s rights, their autonomy, are in danger, and this is not a good start to what can happen because the United States Court has just let a Mississippi law on abortion be discussed, a case that is a challenge to the Roe judgment – explained Ávila-Guillén.

For the lawyer “it is time for Congress to act and decide to protect the right to abortion with a federal law, like that of Argentina”. If the United States had a law on voluntary termination of pregnancy like Argentina’s, the right to abortion would not depend on the position on the subject of the members of the Supreme Court. “It’s time for President (Joe) Biden’s and Congressional administration to act,” he urged.

The new Texas law provides penalties for physicians such as taking their license and not allowing them to practice, but does not include jail terms for them or for women who abort.

“It’s a very clear war against medical personnel. There are no sanctions against women because when they wanted to include them, they realized that they were unpopular even within the Republican sectors. Over 90 percent of the population does not support the criminalization of women. It is a law against abortion service providers that will affect the life and health of women, ”said Ávila Guillén.

Until now, laws that directly contradict the framework established by the Supreme Court in 1973 – which are promoted by anti-rights sectors in various US states – including those that ban all abortions or limit abortions to the first weeks of pregnancy, they have been systematically repealed by the courts.

.

[ad_2]
Source link