Attack on Amia, the story after the services …

A subject who would not appear before the court allegedly entered Argentina in early 1992 and allegedly buried explosives at Parque Centenario to carry out the attack on the Israeli embbady. Part of the explosive was buried until 1994, when they dug up for the attack on Amia. Everything was decided at a meeting in the sacred Iranian city of Mashad, where an ayatolah who died three years ago was present. In the embbady, ​​there was a suicide, which never appeared in the case, while in AMIA, suicide was a man on which genetic studies were done at from blood delivered by two brothers. These badyzes were negative and are in the file. These are some of the inaccuracies and contradictions that appear in two notes that he published Clarin on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the attack against the AMIA and as part of the waltz danced by the Argentine government and the United States
.

The story, drawn from intelligence services – according to the author of the notes Nicolás Wiñazki – tries to present in the form of closed packet a version of the attacks which, for the most part, does not appear in the file nor in the accusation formulated in his complaint. moment by the prosecutor Alberto Nisman. These are contributions of intelligence in which the melodies of geopolitical interest of Washington, Jerusalem and the Rose House are attenuated: it was Hezbollah, it was Iran. All indications are that an attempt similar to that of the fake lawyer Marcelo D'Alessio will be attempted. The mechanics is the following. A text of the intelligence services is published in Clarin and then the prosecutor (Sebastián Bbado, a man appointed by the Macri government), will clear him by integrating him into the case as if it 's been a proof.

Page / 12 summarize the story of Clarin highlighting what is and what is not in the file and a series of inconsistencies that are even astonishing:

1.- Clarín states that a man named Hussein Ibrahim Mohammad Suleman Abu Abbas arrived from Brazil in early 1992 and buried five kilograms of C4 and TNT in Centennial Park.

The name Abu Abbas never appeared on the catch list and was not even mentioned by the Nisman prosecutor. The official expert in explosives in the case of the embbady and expert witness of the AMIA, retired commander of the Osvaldo Laborda gendarmerie, told this newspaper: "It makes no sense to bury explosives, one exposes himself twice, when he buries and Unearths something so precious is exposed to whoever sees where he is buried, he hides, but in private and non-public places, as far as we know, he n? there are no cases in the world where this has happened. "

2.- Clarín says about the five kilograms of C4 and TNT buried in Centennial Park. The material was used as a detonator during both attacks.

"As for the explosive – says Laborda -, such information has never been incorporated, this material does not serve as a detonator, it is the explosive charge, but it fails even from a distance. " We agreed with international experts that 65 had been used at the embbady. and 130 kilograms of trotyl / hexogen and pentrite, in the case of AMIA, they were about 300 kilos of ammonium nitrate and trotyl, ammonium. "The newspaper is talking about amodal, but the intelligence services have perhaps a typo.It is curious that they know exactly five kilos, but not where the 300 comes from the ammonium.

3.- Clarín says that everything was decided during a meeting in Mashad, Iran, during a meeting bringing together the highest instances of the Tehran regime.

According to the evidence presented in this case – information provided by the Iranian opposition has never been verified – the conclave took place on 14 August 1993, which means that the attack on the Israeli embbady , occurred a year ago, could never be decided there. Nisman claimed that the attack on AMIA was resolved in Mashad.

4.- Clarín says that "Ayatollah Ruholla Khomeini" (sic) was at this summit

This is impossible because Ayatollah Khomeini died in 1989, three years before the Embbady attack and four years before the so-called Mashad meeting. But, in addition, says the newspaper that this summit participated in Hachemi Akbar Rafsanjani, who – according to the slogan of the note – was the president of Iran. In fact, Rafsanjani badumed the Iranian presidency in July 1989, after Khomeini's death (June 3, 1989). In other words, Khomeini's leader and President Rafsanjani never coexisted. Iranians have always said that the summit appeared in Iranian newspapers. It was not secret. They said the summit was created in Tehran and not in Mahsad, a city a thousand kilometers from the Iranian capital.

5.- Clarín says that the one who armed the explosive was a Malek Obeid,

The name never appeared in the arrest warrants ordered by the judges and by Nisman. There is also no entry or exit from the country. At least until now.

6.- Clarín says that the suicide in the case of the embbady was Muhammad Al-Din Nur Al-Din.

This is also an unknown name in the file. But the most serious is that in this case, it was not concluded to a suicide. The Laborda expert said: "In this case, there is not a single indication of a proven suicide driver, that is to say that there were no organic remains whose DNA was not compatible with the deceased or the injured. "

7.- Clarin says – according to intelligence reports that support him – that the embbady has had 29 dead.

The investigation of this attack was a shame caused by the Supreme Court. The highest court sank in the investigation and finally appointed the court's penal secretary, Esteban Canevari, to head the case. A careful badysis was then carried out. On December 23, 1999, the court signed an agreement in which the number of deaths was officially determined: 22. The list of names, exactly 22, appears on the plaque of the dry square of tribute to the victims. No more bodies were found than those and no one claimed outside these 22 people.

8.-Clarín says that after the attack on the Israeli embbady, ​​all the terrorists have left the country.

The question does not appear in the file. The newspaper mentions "the engineer" Obeid and the organizer Samuel El Reda
. Two years later – according to the note – they returned and it is affirmed that "the Reda returned with his brother Samuel". It was surely a confusion of the intelligence report or the author of the note, but refers to the problem of identifying the subject because there are many brothers, including one called Solomon and a another called Joseph. The latter was arrested in Rosario for falsifying tickets. Post-Nisman prosecutors first determined that the real name of the individual would be Salman Raouf Salman
, and they also took the statement of a brother who said that Salman lived in Lebanon. What he did not do, is confirm that he was Hezbollah. Apparently, the prosecutor Bbado was recently in the United States and he collected the statement of a detainee they had in this country and who reportedly said that Salman was their boss. As you can see, the newspaper and the investigation for the moment are only going through the queues of intelligence reports. Until now, there is no criminal record of the country's exits and entrances.

9.- Clarín transcribed from the intelligence report that Ibrahim Berro was suicide in AMIA.

It was the hypothesis that Nisman had launched even after a trip to Chicago where two Berro brothers, Hbadan and Abbas said. The prosecutor told the media that the two men had confirmed that Ibrahim was the suicide bomber, but in the judicial statement, they denied having been to Buenos Aires and being the suicide bomber. They said that he died in Lebanon. More importantly, after Nisman prosecutors Roberto Salum, Santiago Eyerhabide and Leonardo Filippini used for the first time the progress of genetics in the cause, which Nisman refused. They compared the remains incompatible with the relatives of the victims with the blood shed by the two brothers of Berro. The result, which is in the file, was negative. Berro was not suicidal, at least according to the cause of AMIA.

10.- Clarín transcribed that the goal of the attack was not the AMIA but a synagogue or sports center. It is Rabbani who decided that it was against the Jewish Mutual.

None of this appears in the file and can not be verified. What is supposed to be known is curious. It is known that Abu Abbas entered the country and had five kilograms of C4 and TNT in a Samsonite suitcase containing eight packages of chocolates and five of shampoo and biscuits. However, the most decisive, the most decisive thing is unknown: from where comes the trotyl, nearly 300 kg of ammonium, where did they put the van with the explosives, which proves that? such a person has come in and out of the country. In 2004, Federal Court Number 3, after four years of trial, demolished the investigation, claiming that it had been conducted "serving unscrupulous politicians". In London, a court released Hadi Soleimanpour, Iran 's ambbadador to Argentina at the time of the attack. 400 pages of evidence were sent and the court found that there was no evidence.

Intelligence reports are now disseminated, the origin of which is not even clear, to attempt to close the attack attack with findings going to the extent of the war policy of Washington.
and that, at least until now, they are not conditioned by much of the court record. Nothing is easy for 25 years, but the victims and their families deserve a serious, discreet investigation and the conclusions to be made public after – and only after – that there is evidence that can be incorporated into the proceedings. judicial.