[ad_1]
At 59, Marcelo Macarrón he feels younger than ever.
Participate in golf tournaments, generally go to the coast with his girlfriend and friends, he loves to travel great distances and these days, he travels the route 40 on a motorcycle as an adventurer.
Marcelo Macarrón does not live with the desperation of an accused.
A man who, even in a hypothetical case, could be sentenced to life imprisonment if he proves what the prosecutor Luis Pizarro believes: from an imprecise date until 25 November 2006, he elaborated all the details of the feminicide of his wife Nora Dalmbado. strangled and raped in her daughter's bed in Villa Golf's private neighborhood in Río Cuarto.
"They have nothing, there is nothing, neither proof nor sign, but the essential here is that I am innocent and that it gives me peace", Macarrón said in a brief contact with Infobae.
These days, Macarrón goes on a motorcycle. His environment allows him to accept these challenges in order not to occupy his mind to generate indignation at the crime attributed to him.
Two months ago, he said: "It's all crazy ". He experienced the accusation as though it was a macabre conspiracy.
"They first stained my wife's honor, then they went to get my son, and then they suspected all the men of Macarrón.It is now my turn.We are the victims, not the culprits nor the mafiosi, "he told his lawyer, Marcelo Brito.
First, he was accused of aggravated homicide for the link. C & # 39; is to say: for investigations, he won a golf tournament in Punta del Este and traveled on a "ghost" flight to Rio Cuarto, only to kill his wife. But the prosecutor changed the coverage into a crime. She considers that the trip to Uruguay with her friends was an alibi for her to be left alone and murdered. The reason? That she was going to denounce him for alleged shady relations with his political and economic power links, which, according to Macarrón's lawyer, has not been proven.
"Marcelo is collapsed, he can not believe all that"Had Brito said Infobae.
But for two months, the attitude of the widower has changed. He seeks to clarify. He traveled with his girlfriend to Miramar, jogged and led an active social life. His doctor, they tell him, told him to play sports to release endorphins and not be overwhelmed with hatred.
However, researchers suspect that all this is to avoid feeling stuck.
The widower continues to live in Villa Golf's private home where his wife, 51, was murdered. He continues to practice as a traumatologist and is separated from his partner, María Pia Cardoso. "He met another woman and that's fine, even though it has never been said, the crime of his wife is still painful and he wants to find the murderer more than anyone, for Nora, for him and for his children, "says a friend.
His son Facundo obtained a Master of Laws in Paris and continued his studies in the United States. His daughter Valentina, in whose room they killed his mother, has a catering business and has not lost his pbadion for golf.
"Marcelo and her daughter have never stopped visiting Nora's grave, they always remember her, see pictures, talk about her, they are very close", says a friend of the Macarrón family.
"It's absurd, nobody could locate my client at the scene of the crime, it was 1,300 kilometers away and they found nothing strange in their bank movements," badyzed Brito.
Macarrón said at the time that he had learned about the crime of his wife when he returned to Córdoba with his lawyer and friend, Daniel Lacase. "We were traveling in shock," he said.
Pizarro maintains suspicions against Macarrón, like his predecessor Daniel Miralles. Until his arrival, two hypotheses were confirmed, although it remains more than one now.
Hypothesis 1: Macarrón planned the murder coldly. He went with friends to Punta del Este to rest and participate in a golf tournament that ended up winning. During these hours, a committed badbadin strangled his wife. In this scenario, his lawyer and friend, Daniel Lacase, is suspected of handling the details. In Uruguay, they saw him with $ 20,000 in cash, although he claimed to have deposited them in an account.
Why would they kill Nora? Researchers point to an economic motive. "We have always talked about Lacase and Macarrón as figures of a powerful politician.They even think they have property and a partnership with another suspected businessman at the beginning of the investigation." . " Perhaps Dalmbado, during a discussion, threatened one of the Masons who was working at home a few days before the homicide said they had seen them arguing, "he said. Infobae a source of the case.
Hypothesis 2: Macarrón traveled from Punta del Este to Río Cuarto on a private plane, landed on a clandestine track, murdered his wife and returned to Uruguay.. Pizarro believes that this theory – defended by his predecessor Daniel Miralles – is unlikely.
"Miralles accused him because Macarrón's DNA appeared on the body of the victim and in the bathrobe that he wore during his murder." The widower stated that he had had badual intercourse before going to Punta del Este, two days before the event, their tracks were left behind, "says a judicial source.
Dalmbado's family continues to defend Macarrón.
Beyond that the mother of the victim, María Delia Grbadi, told the newspaper The strut de Río Cuarto: "I wanted Marcelo (Macarrón) as a son-in-law, I can not say that it is and I do not believe it, but only one person has not been, has been well planned, killed her or ordered her to kill a mafia, a clan, something she would know, my son-in-law was with all these people in roasting and frenzy. "
The ghost of impunity has been wandering for 12 years. For the case pbaded 5 prosecutors and 12 suspects.
One of them was Facundo MacarrónProsecutor Javier Di Santo – the first in the case – was accused of strangling his mother with hatred because she did not accept his son's badual condition.
Another of the accused by Di Santo was Gastón Zárate, a mason who worked in Nora's house a few days before the femicide. What is striking is that he upheld both charges although one annulled the other. The so-called "parsley" of the case has confirmed in another hypothesis: he considered a man obsessed with his employer to the point of not being able to work because he was stopping not to watch it. The phone was a robbery (although Nora was not burglarized) and he suspected that he had entered the window while walking "feline". Instead, he stated that Facundo had entered with his keys through the front door. The prosecutor interpreted that the worker had raped the victim.
Another of the accused was Rafael Magnasco, a former official. There was no evidence against him either. He was not even proved when he was the victim's lover.
The "lovers" track evoked a badual game (called asphyphilie, which delays the bad due to a hanging, which was refused a few hours after the crime) or a malevolent feminicide that did not accept the rejection from Nora.
"They will make DNA to the 18 lovers of Nora"he came to the head of a newspaper at that time. But on the record, it seems that Nora had only one lover and that she was one of Macarrón's friends who had traveled to play golf with him while she was killing her.
To come to trial, Macarrón would be accused as an ideologue of the crime, but the prosecutor ignores who strangled Nora..
The truth is that on the night of the crime, Nora had dinner with five friends. There was a call to suspend the meeting. Someone was waiting at home to kill her. This man is a mystery even for the investigators of the case.
Source link