Broad impact in case of failure that would affect the Diario Popular

Up to the owner Inter-American Press Association (SIP), at its recent meeting in Colombia, expressed concern over the judicial resolution that could threaten the continuity of the journalistic environment and "Keep an informative voice".

The subject was relevant news in several media. So for example Infobae published an article with the title Due to a controversial court decision, the continuity of Diario Popular is in danger and reports in detail on the litigation as a whole and the consequences if the claim is safeguarded.

The nation notes, meanwhile, "SIP support for the continuity of the journalistic media" and stressed the report in which it says "in his report of the mid-year meeting that took place this weekend at Cartagena of India, Colombia, the SIP He highlighted the case of Impreba, the editor of the morning newspaper Popular newspaper, who denounced the fact that because of the legal claim of an individual for attorney's fees and the attempt to apply debt determination formulas remote from economic reality, a virtual risk of confiscation is dedicated to the badets of the company & # 39;

Clarinalso underlines the report of the Iberoamerican Press Association (SIP) and the section referring to the situation of Popular newspaper a failure that would threaten its continuity, as well as the danger for hundreds of workers. Online politics stresses that "A court decision could result in the closure of Diario Popular" and adds: "the interest in dollars claimed for the fees of a lawyer endanger the subsistence of the medium".

IN ADDITION:

Concern over an uncontrolled fire in Neuquén

More than 70% of the house employees are in the informality

The note also adds that "the case is extremely serious because it jeopardizes the viability of the environment and, consequently, the loss of many sources of work. Inter-American Press Association (SIP)at his recent meeting at Colombia, where he expressed his concern at the judicial resolution that could threaten the continuity of Popular and "Keep an informative voice".

L & # 39; agency Argentine News explain that "Irrational Failure to Confiscate Threatens Diario Popular" and note: "an irrational failure could lead to the closure of the historical Popular newspaper, a situation which was noticed by Inter-American Press Association (SIP) during his recent meeting at Colombia, where he expressed his "concern" about the judicial resolution. "Several radios like Radio 10, Del Plata and others have echoed in their different and prestigious programs to the situation in which they are badigned Popular newspaper.

As well Chronic Journal reflects the information with a title that says: Popular newspaper, in danger. In addition, the pre-candidate to the president, Daniel Scioli, retweeted in his twitter account the article published yesterday by the informative portal Infobae, in which he mentions the judicial decision and its consequences, Diego Bossio, in his tweet said: "The Argentine state must guarantee the freedom of expression and jobs that compromise this decision.A big hug to all those who make @populardiario".

It should be noted that the judicial request for José Carlos Arcagni, an individual for legal fees, and attempting to apply debt determination formulas far from the economic reality of the country, there is a risk that it will end up committing a quasi-confiscatory business badets Impreba, publisher of Everyday Popular.

The decision at first instance ignored the payment the plaintiff had received as well as the legislation in force (which imposes normal professional fees in pesos), setting a dollar amount based on an unusual estimate of the stock package, although greater than the actual value. from the company. But what is most disturbing in this situation is the unusual, abusive and confiscatory claim of wanting to apply an interest rate higher than 30% per annum in dollars to a sentence, whereas it does not actually exceed 1 or 2% per year. According to the complainant, the debt would greatly exceed the current value of the company.

Now, a judicial decision of the Civil Chamber of Appeal House J, integrated by the judges Beatriz Alicia Veron, Marta del Rosario Mattera and Patricia Barberi. The company is convinced that this decision will preserve the sense of justice, otherwise jobs will be lost and the constitutional guarantee of the freedom of the press affected.