Daniel Santoro defended himself against D'Alessio's accusation: "I have never given any information to make intelligence"

The journalist Daniel Santoro said that he "had never provided any information to obtain information", after the fake lawyer, Marcelo D'Alessio, appointed him in front of Judge Alejo Ramos Padilla, in the case that investigates extortion against an employer, allegedly on behalf of the prosecutor. Carlos Stornelli. The journalist Clarin, highlighted by D'Alessio as part of his plot to obtain data and spying, claimed: "He used my name without my consent".

It is that the judge investigates the false lawyer who, when he met with businessmen he extorted, told the journalist that they could be named in his notes, as a pressure mechanism.

"At D'Alessio I met him at the end of 2016. I was introduced by a police reporter from Clarin. D'Alessio meets more than twenty journalists. I will not name them because today is like the toxic stain, "he explained in relation to the way they met, he said:" I was introduced to talk about the traffic. of drugs linked to the triple crime of General Rodríguez. "

When qualifying, Santoro did not hesitate: "D'Alessio is an extortionist, this seems to come from a story of Fyodor Dostoevsky. On the one hand, he talks about friendship, family, verbiage, speed, almost verbal incontinence. And on the other hand he used my name without my knowledge nor my permission to extort people. It takes a very complex mentality, two faces, to be able to do something like that. "

The reporter self-criticized and explained the particular situation in which a greater bond of trust had been created: "It's a guy who it overwhelms you with the words, it envelops you immediately and quickly makes you a psychological profile. With me, there was a circumstance, a part of my error, of my imprudence. I met him in November 2016 and I had a pulmonary embolism in January. "

"He called me and said: Daniel, Daniel, I have to see you, I could not leave, I was at rest, it's at that moment." there that I said, "Well, I came to my house. "I got it for a coffee and he began to enter. This is a very educated, very kind person. That's how I won my trust. It was my imprudence, to let him into my home environment, "he added.

The appearance of Santoro's name began when agricultural entrepreneur Pedro Etchebest denounced in Dolores court that D'Alessio had demanded $ 500,000 – although he then lowered 300,000 dollars – so that the federal prosecutor Carlos Stornelli does not investigate the "notebooks" for the words of a "repentant". It was at that time that Judge Ramos Padilla accused Santoro of having established intelligence reports for D'Alessio.

In dialogue with ProfileSantoro felt that "Etchebest" is a victim ". "It is clear that D'Alessio has extorted from him, but he plays the role of asking him questions, to pbad me out of the window, he has nothing to do with me, apart from the mention of "my friend Bogoliuk" (the former Commissioner of the Province of Buenos Aires, prisoner) in the preliminary statement in which he speaks of D "Alessio", he insisted.