Dialogue yes, no dialogue: fear of political violence of paralyzed hearts



[ad_1]

The cimbronazo that provoked yesterday's attack at Congress Square erased society's worst memories of political violence in the country and surely plunged it for a moment, at least, in the reflection. This social unrest, which has certainly been reinforced by the images seen on television, has come to give a quota of turbulent dramas to a somewhat quieted present from the economic and financial point of view and more adapted to the political, although it is not the only one in the world. In fact, the placebo that was to arrive until June was beginning to dilute a bit because of certain hypocrisies, including the revived pretension of the "red circle" and some radicals to direct him to Mauricio Macri of the electoral theater. Donald Trump's question about the elections and his willingness to transcend was obviously not naive at all.

In the list of simulations and misunderstandings that have been identified in recent days in politics, there was something for everyone. First, the 10 statements made to the President to resume the political initiative, but especially to give certainty to the markets. "There are 10 points to ensure governability, so everyone can do their plan of government"clarified the governor of Buenos Aires, Maria Eugenia Vidal.

What has been observed so far is the diligent accompaniment of some of the opposition, although showing with some concern some points of their own programs, of all the critics to the ruling party and generally agreeing not to lose the electoral train. Thus, Roberto Lavagna, unwilling to respond at first, when he explained the meaning of the government decalogue, was dispatched with points much more operational than the government, marking a few lines of action towards the future, s he finally decided to apply.

Sergio Mbada did the same and even the most combative left placed his 10 goals in the big top, while Minister Rogelio Frigerio faced the first meetings with the governors of the PJ in anticipation of the important election of Córdoba Sunday, during which begin to define some leadership within the so-called Federal Peronism, while the DUC – which in fragmented competition – will seek its destination at the end of the month at the National Convention, fracture for sure also, although the candidate for the vice-presidency of Macri is finally radical. The truth is that with so much activity, almost everyone has benefited from a bit of audience and vanity that emerged after the initiative had been bastard enough, the words "dialogue" and "consensus" Having tortured their respective senses until exhaustion.

Only two actors in the current vaudeville that is developing in Argentina have remained true to its principles: the Church and Kirchnerism. The first came directly from Rome, highlighting a well-known slogan, undeniable sign of Bergoglian: that all actors focus on the social, with an open agenda, listening and a synthesis of the opinions of the whole . The idea of ​​the bishops is to attack at the root of the dialogue three paralyzing problems: poverty, inflation and drug trafficking.

According to the prelates, the process should lead to a reformulation of the state, so that it is neither collectivist nor even when it fulfills essential fiscal duties that it encourages, its management is foreign to the needs of those who have the least. From a political point of view, it is a copy of this "culture of encounter" of 2001-2002 which allowed to balance the objectives and to prepare the ground for the double surplus of the tandem Néstor Kirchner-Lavagna. More deeply, the ecclesial suggestion aims to deal with a kind of Argentine variant, adapted to our time, the "Rerum Novarum", an encyclical that follows and generally praises Pope Francis.

Regarding the position of Kirchnerism, the reading is clear and does not pose major doubts, because it has continued to express with increasing vehemence what it wants to do with the future of Argentina and this goes in the direction of the radicalization of "we go all" and his Bolivarian pbadion that has removed the Citizen Unity from other Peronist tendencies. The electoral booklet K comes directly from the head of the movement, Cristina Fernandez, from the sincericide expressed in "Sincerely", from her book, or from several of her collaborators, some recognized and authorized, as well as from other careers that seem to seek, like all Kirchnerisms in general, that distorts the political taba to get rid of their own judicial procedures.

As no one denies them inside the doors, the bias of what is said is always to be disabled and to put in black and white what will be a possible government of the former president. Probably so many manifestations of populist fanaticism with excessive fanaticism because what they are always trying to give to the president and his government in an ultramaquiavélico role, although it is also possible that the personal absurdities end up giving the Kirchner a lot of votes undecided.

Some of the cases of recent days have been emblematic. Yesterday, the tweet of Luis D 'Elía about the attack suffered by the deputy of La Rioja Héctor Olivares, an episode of violence that destroyed the country for several hours and ended the life of his friend and advisor Miguel Yadón, said: "Macri's intelligence services have no limits", pontificated amidst investigations, as he had a crystal ball. The intellectual Mempo Giardinelli, number of Open Letter, harangued the troops stating that it was necessary to advance "towards a new constitution, of popular origin, issue of a referendum where the Argentine people will demonstrate and develop a new social pact, "He stressed that" the justice system we maintain should not be more a power, but a service (of the executive power) ". At the time of the humanitarian catastrophe Venezuela was going through, it was like waving the rope in the hangman's house.

The tweet of now Kirchner Juan Grabois, sibilinamente devoted to Mercado Libre, the most prosperous company of Argentina, was not far behind in terms of impact, although in this case certain condiments deserve to be underlined. On a Bloomberg screen with the company's list, with a fund where Marcos Galperín and Macri are kissed (an unusual collage in his posts), the leader accuses the company of "contraband, evasion, financial speculation, consumer abuse and competition unfair "and points out that his" success lies in the destruction of thousands of jobs, Macri has made billionaires at your expense, "he said.

Beyond the controversy over the application of the benefits of the software law (the Free Mercado was accepted as such by the Kirchner administration in 2007 and revalidated by the CFK in 2014), all indicates that this fits perfectly because of a platform. But, moreover, no company has as much tax control as most of the card sales made by Mercado Libre, a company that is struggling to create jobs and sales, especially in the microenterprises of the interior. , and that generates transparent competition. Some versions allude to the fact that Mercado Pago (subsidiary of ML) will begin to accredit social plans and Grabois's struggles go through the loss of control of the beneficiaries, but it is certain that the development of the tweet shows the remarkable aversion that Kirchnerism has The general is concerned with capitalism which goes in the direction of some papal prejudices about it.

Kirchner's explicit statement-making badertion to the strawberry dessert in Cristina Kirchner's presentation at the Book Fair, with all the condiments to make an act of cenacle and without journalism (another ratification). As already said, there is no different character or "abuenado", because there are innumerable examples in the book that show the traditional facets of the current character of the senator and her way of thinking that, in addition anecdotes and all its dismal victimizations allude to the current president as the owner of the "chaos", a good campaign pipe. It's your nature. In his desire to flatter, D'Elia badociated yesterday's attack to Congress with the presentation of "Sincerely," just "the day that @CFKArgentina will return to the center of the political universe. "he said, as if she had withdrawn. .

La Cristina who did not give the band and the cane not to submit to an "act of surrender" probably does not want to know who can enter the dialogue, or if she does, after taking note of what the Church said, she will surely try to impose their own conditions. In one way or another, the opponents are at the feet of the government, although there is no certainty that this will lead to anything concrete except perhaps to increase spending to finish squeezing the cow, which still represents neglected taxpayers But the saddest conclusion of the skein running is that amid so much rhetoric has not yet been expressed, on behalf of anyone, not even a poor "how".

.

[ad_2]
Source link