Did Consuelo have different standards with Sandra and Thelma?

For several months, the public prosecutor's office (MP) and the International Commission against Impunity in Guatemala (CICIG) worked hand-in-hand to deal with the cases as they were ready, knowing that in the investigations, there are things that exceed the will of researchers and even, still somewhere in 2018 that the mechanics continued to be given.

But everything changed when the case against ONE was brought before the office of Consuelo Porras, because the dream of the just was asleep and it was only allowed until that Sandra Torres has been registered as a presidential candidate and enjoys immunity, which strengthens the cooptación control that exists at the Supreme Court of Justice (SCJ), has given her guarantees to be able to participate in the contest.

And I bring the case to snack, because the statements of the prosecutor Melvin Medina last week that said: "When the file arrives we do not have them yet (reports), we had but at my discretion, they had still need to enrich the file.We had to run, badyze, come Saturday and badyze to see what we are going to ask, "he said. Last week, Porras nodded when Medina spoke.

The prosecutor was frank, but he draws a lot of attention to the fact that this haste in one case did not occur in the other. Everyone in Guatemala should be held responsible, but it is no secret that Consuelo Porras was elected by Sandra Torres's main ally at this point, that Jimmy Morales and Sandra Torres have Thelma Aldana between their eyes and that Consuelo Porras has a question to ask. staff against the former prosecutor.

There is no other way to understand that "we had to run" is the way the member wanted to make sure before a judge that the process was progressing and perhaps declared the reserve because he was most likely they asked for the arrest warrant to ensure that Aldana remains out of contention.

Consuelo Porras, with this double standard, would erase all doubts and confirm the conditions under which Jimmy Morales would have named it. She will be able to talk a lot and say that she is a woman by right, but after accepting the demands of those who are operating back in the past when Guatemala discusses her future, they place her as the great ally of those who wish to continue to maintain the foundations of the company. cooptation.

It would have been different for Guatemala if its two main candidates had participated in legal charges and had spoken of not agreeing, but as it affected both, they focused on the settlement and tried to capture Aldana before To be registered, because the intention was to leave the absent one, while the one who voted to change the election financing continues its efforts to decriminalize the funding, while tightening the links that they also had maintained during the 2006 campaign.

Many people have complained about Zury Rios and, as an acquaintance told me on Friday, "Even I, who is not a lawyer, read and understand that she can not"; they said that the application of this law was a judicialization of politics and that it would be important to see what they say now when they arrested Sandra Torres but accelerated the Thelma Aldana, seeking to capture it and to leave it aside.

Remember what Congress did with the auditor, how he convened the Clerk of Citizens and the Supreme Electoral Tribunal to lobby for the same case of Aldana. The best example of the impact of these cases on the reality of the country is that revenge is well executed with essential support such as that of Consuelo Porras.