Diego Reinhold: "I will never judge a thief, I have also committed illegal acts"



[ad_1]

Saturday, May 18, 2019 11:13



"I will never judge a thief," warns Diego Reinhold, and admits to have committed illegal acts. "I like to talk about what I do or my faults, sometimes we hear:" (Nicolás) del Caño buys dollars, "or" (Pablo) Echarri is in New York. "It's not a question of whether I'm a Communist and whether I buy dollars or not, it's about how you set up ways of thinking and how it generates awareness. " badyzes the comedian, who returned to the complex La Plaza with Comedy Show.

The new show is composed of the best presentations of recent years: "Of course, with a lot of interaction with the screen", clarifies Diego he found in technology a fundamental return to differentiate his artistic proposal, to the point that he coordinates the design and badembly of the entire graph.

Diego Reinhold presents his new show at Paseo la Plaza.

– Are there cabals before show?

-No, I'm completely relaxed. In fact, I think that to create humor, you have to be as decentralized as possible. If you get ready and start to focus, the instrument is a little tortured.

– How is work done at home?

-Well good. We have been working with children on the ground for three years. Two years before the construction of the house. Already five years of intense work. The civil badociation has worked a lot; I arrived six years ago.

– What is the name of the house?

-Mariposa And our NGO is called Simple Concepts. We are in Caballito.

-What is the number of guys?

-13.

-Age?

-The largest is 7 years old, the youngest entered with two weeks and must now have 2 months. They come very young.

Diego Reinhold is one of the collaborators of the house Mariposa in the district of Caballito

-And are these children who are in contact with their biological family or have already lost it?

-Depends on each one's case. It depends on how your cause comes from.

– Are they in the adoption system?

– They are institutionalized and some enter into adoptability and start looking for candidates who do not seek us, the court seeks them. And other no, others are trying to reconnect with their family or with whom it has been decided to be linked.

-Anybody has already been adopted?

-Yes a lot. They are already gone like 30 guys.

– What happens when you leave with a family?

-C & # 39; is a joy. What happens is that it does not stop there either. The cases must be followed because they sometimes go to families where we realize that everything is fine, but in other cases, they go with families in situations that are not the best. You need to monitor them closely for the economic problems they encounter or for other cases … For example, we have the case of children being taken away by a family member and the family. State had promised them to grant three minimum allowances because they were going to Quilmes. deep, and that could not be executed, it never came into effect. This woman was with the boys and at 10 months she gave them back because she could not feed them. They never gave him what they said they were going to give him. And sometimes children come back, sometimes during periods of bonding between parents …

-They can not.

The proto-parents would be, they will realize that they do not and they come back. There are situations that are unfavorable. We also have our perception of what is best for this boy, but that's what the court says and you have to attend. It's a very subtle job.

-Today there are 13 boys, what happens with that? You have put a lot of body in recent years to this work.

-Yes, I think I do not take it anymore. This month is the first one experiencing serious economic difficulties. Now we are going to set up a benefit function, we are funding a lot with that. Fortunately, I have many colleagues in the guild who every time I tell them: "Che, you dare to give us your magic", they come to fill the theater. In general, people help a lot with that. This allows us to have a cushion to move forward. But this mattress is finished; we have to generate a new mattress, a cushion or something like that … We are part of all the homes related to the state, we then receive a contribution from the state, but that not enough. Clearly not enough. And the increases are not depending on what increases everything.

– Do you feel that there is a paternity exercise out there?

-No, there is an exercise in love. I could not do it because fatherhood is already like … I do not know if the word defines everything that means already. Have you seen that the family changes and that the words change, the senses change? I understand that I give love and that I do what I can with the people who need it in this case. And if, at some point, I had to stay with someone for an hour or a day, I will think about it.

– In fact, beyond the common life, one can sometimes paternar or mother with a nephew, with the son of a friend. It may not be a hundred percent of the time, but that love is about wanting the best for them.

-I want the best for them, so I get them out of there. So that they are not always at home, I take them out, take them to the theater, take them for a walk. I could take them four to see the sea. It's an intimacy, but it happened to me one day he said "daddy". I have electricity everywhere, but I had to tell him that it was not his father. Yes, I am someone who helps you, clearly. My idea is to take them out and see the worlds and perceive the worlds so that they understand that there are many things that they can experience beyond reality. For example, you think it because you had another life, there is a positive view of it because they are well cared for. I see the children in the street and I say, "Well, those who are at home, as I say at home, are very good, they have everything."

-Inclusive, to those who can, help them to return with their families.

-It is also interesting to see the path taken by these children as they enter the house and it is a very critical situation for any conscience. They are totally altered, deformed, time pbades and they relax. Because of course, no one is harming them, no one will rape anything. Inside, they are transformed. You also see how they turn against themselves when the legal situation begins to become half-unfavorable. We now have a situation with three brothers who, in January, had nominated candidates. They went with these candidates, with their prospective parents, and the parents decided not to do it. So they went home, which is difficult for the children because we have to explain to them that …

-C & # 39; is a new rejection.

-Of course, it did not work. And now they told me that there was only one file of parents who wanted two, not three. After this file, there is nothing left. This is not so easy.

-It is terrible. State responsibility rests with children who have the right to have a home. It is not up to parents that we can not have children. Because in general, the demand is for children under one year old and sometimes there are older children, siblings or children with special needs who are waiting a long time or who are never adopted.

-We must also see what goes through the parents' heads, and sometimes we have to think in perspective. Imagine if they had gone through this fear without coming back, what would happen with time?

-You talked about the fear of boys when they arrive until they understand that they will not be raped there. You have experienced situations of violence in your childhood, family, and school.

– Anywhere, yes.

– Does it bring you one more time?

Yes absolutely. I see it, I think it and see how to heal it in me and how to eliminate it in them. That must have to do with that. I try not to go too far, otherwise I would become too cold. I do what I want.

-At school, punctually, what happened.

– These are subtleties, these are things that can be violent for one and not for others. It is the degree of tolerance of each, the way everyone perceives things. Today, leaving Retiro for the subway, I said to myself: "Of course, I swore to carry the flag", and that seems violent to me.

– Swear to the flag? Why violent?

-Why should I swear something? What do you mean?

-Loyalty, pride, patriotism …

-Out. Go through other things, not swearing. Do you understand what I mean? This goes through a natural love for the feeling of family, belonging. But swear? You have to wake up, you do not have to impose it.

-How did you take the anthem at school?

-I thought it was funny at the time. What happens is that there is an underlying message that programs people. This happens with the patriotic symbols, with the religions, with all that is related to a hegemony of thoughts that you have to install in this virgin processor that is presented to you as a blank and you have to install programs for me. With an operating system that must be the one you have proposed. We have forgotten here that these things must appear out of curiosity and not by a question of functionality.

"I swore the flag and it seems violent" says Diego Reinhold alone with Teleshow.

– Vegano follow?

-No no

-Were you gone?

-Abandon, yes.

-Do you go back to the meat?

-A little. It is not easy.

– It is not easy to return to meat or is not easy to be vegan?

-It's not easy at all. In today 's Reinhold, in 2019, I continue to champion the most peaceful values. It means not hurting anyone or anything. What I realize is that purism is not good. This does not mean that it is good for me to lift my own restrictions after a momentary profit, but I realize that there is a strong crack in what happens to us between stubborn purism …

-The half-fanatic thing.

-No, no, the idea of ​​doing things right. The idea of ​​good, right? Like there was someone who was good and pure and who will do things well. And that does not exist. We are all the time with internal contradictions and we have to endure that, accept the contradiction, accept the darkness inside, the corruption inside, and manage it since the incorporation, and not by rejection and denial. I like to speak in terms not of what I do, in that I am half hypocritical, not what I do, what I can do or where I am. have faults. You have seen that sometimes you listen: "Del Caño buys dollars" or "Echarri is in New York". For Boludo, yes, except that it's not whether I'm a communist, whether I buy dollars or not. It's about seeing how you are setting up ways of thinking and how it generates awareness in others. Personally, I do what I can, what I can. Beyond what I think, it's good to think and act in a way.

– Similarly, without questioning the place where an actor spends his holidays or his mobile phone, if we think about politicians, a little consistency between what they say and what they would not be bad.

-But a little, not everything, because if everything does not become very rigid back.

-If you tell me: "Flying is bad", and then I catch you to fly, it's a bit difficult to sustain …

"But do you know that I will never judge a thief? Because I understand that a person who reaches a point where she decides to do an act that can be substantially opposed, which can end up doing a lot of pain, there is something that distorts; He's no longer so aware of what he's doing. So, I do not judge him. Justice, yes.

-Can you have a thief friend?

-I do not know, but I have also committed illegal acts.

-What was the worst thing you did?

-I spent an ultra-thin computer on my back, at the customs. I put it on my back like that, I walked right up and overpbaded the computer. I felt an adventurer. It is illegal.

– Were you a little scared at the time?

"Of course, yes, of course. I could list more, that I'm not going to say it here.

-I ask you if you like it.

-No, no, no, I will not say it here. I think we all … We say, "Hey, I played the numbers of such a thing!" Agree, with my accountant, we sometimes see how we do things, see what we have to do to … Understand? That's what all companies do, everyone. I'm not saying that it must be done; What I say is that we are wearing it inside.

-It is an idiosyncrasy in the attempt to appear the police, celebrate the goal of Maradona with his hand. Are you going to this place?

– What I am saying is that we can not be purists and can not expect Jesus to come down and govern us. In addition, there is something of installation that is very difficult for me and that, in my opinion, does not suit us at all: the idea that the one who made them pays them. First of all, you have to see how he made them. Then you have to look for the whole process of judgment of that person to finish by saying "pay them". Because I see ladies sweeping the path that says, "Let him go prisoner!", And it becomes a medieval situation. As if such a politician was imprisoned, you would feel better. But the thing is going to be worse. The country will not be better because this or that prisoner. And a lot more if politics is involved.

– Do you feel in something close to "they flew but they did it"?

No They all steal but they do it. I could tell everyone, and not everyone does it. No, I do not pay attention to that at all. I can not prove it, by the way; they are all dimes and direts. And the press operations that are done not only in the political sense, but in many ways they are press operations. I can even doubt Michael Jackson with the movie that they did. I do not judge. I look, I take the data, I try to compare. What I do, is see what there is, see what I have in my pocket; See how my family and friends are doing. That's the only thing verifiable. All the rest are TV channels or drivers, reporters who talk.

-And when there is a verdict in a court decision, do you believe it, or even in this case?

– They are people. What I must do is to obey.

– You just talked about Michael Jackson and the documentary.

-I put it as an example; I did not see him.

-I want to take this case, do not talk about Michael Jackson punctually, but sometimes the argument arises: Can you separate the idol from your work of your behaviors in life?

– how not

-I think of Michael Jackson, I think of Woody Allen, I think of Maradona, I think of Carlos Monzón …

"But you must think of Van Gogh, you must think of Baudelaire, you must think of so many others. I mean, what am I caring about? I read the work, I see the painting, listen to his music. How many people do not know anything and you go to the Prado Museum and you look? What do I know, I will not involve myself.

-There is also who says: "I can not see the movies of this guy who raped minors."

– I am super pacifist, for example, and I would never say that we have to kill someone. Never, never, never; I would never say that they steal something, that someone is a thief would not come out of my mouth. I am on the opposite side to Alfredo Casero, but I deeply admire him and love what he does.

Are the election years waiting for you or are you not interested?

-No, I'm on record. The fight is every day. I do not think I'm happy that he wins this or that, and that's all. The work continues. I will win things that I will probably not like, and we will try to improve it. What I'm not going to do is point to the point and say, "He did such a thing."

Source: https://www.infobae.com/teleshow/infoshow/2019/05/18/diego-reinhold-nunca-voy-a-juzgar-a-un-ladron-yo-tambien-he-cometido-actos-ilegales/







->



<! –

->

Most read today

Most read in the week

[ad_2]
Source link