Eleven: The lawyer of several victims asked four years and half of prison for Julio De Vido – 31/07/2018

The lawyer of a group of victims of the Once tragedy, Javier Moral, asked four years and six months in prison for the former Minister of Planning, Julio De Vido , which he accused only for his fraudulent administration . With regard to the other crime for which the powerful former K official is tried, culpable havoc, Moral's complaint finds that only the machinist Marcos Córdoba is guilty. The lawyer also requested that De Vido be permanently prevented from performing public duties.

The hearings of the first trial at which De Vido is confronted resumed Tuesday at 10 am and, on that occasion, at the beginning of the charges, the first speaker was a Moral Advocate who represents a group of relatives of the incident of February 22nd. The former minister is accused of mischief aggravated by death and fraudulent administration. In September, the Federal Federal Court 4 (TOF 4) could issue a judgment .

With the integration of Judges Pablo Bertuzzi, Néstor Costabel, Maria Gabriela López Iñiguez and Ana María D & # 39, Alessio, (the latter acting as deputy judge) the trial for the Tragedy of Eleven, who sat in the box of the accused the former minister, has entered its last stage.

The charge for havoc, that Moral did not ask for De Vido, has a prison of one to five years. On the other hand, it is expected that the other complaints – including the Anti-Corruption Bureau (OA) – will request the maximum penalty for the former minister.

With a firm tone, for two hours, the plaintiff's attorney again explained arguments for which he found the former minister responsible for the fraudulent administration crime. De Vido did not follow the allegations of Marcos Paz prison.

Gustavo Simeonoff, former head of the Public Service Contract Renegotiation and Analysis Unit (UNIREN), is also charged

. Part of the allegations, Moral focused on the role of machinist Marcos Córdoba who accused him of mischief. And in the second part he talked about the two accused

"Everyone knew, everyone closed their eyes, today plays Vido but everyone knew, all the political bow" said Moral about TBA. Thus, he cites as an example the TBA fines of millions of dollars between 2002 and 2006, which amounted to $ 22 million "while the other Belgrano and Roca at the time of badyzing the role of l & # 39; He said: "In nine years, there has been no significant progress, but on the day of the tragedy they reported and withdrew the concession (by decree). May 2012) ". At that time, the company had already accumulated more than 500 fines for a sum of 70 million pesos

He continued with this argumentative line and stressed that "the lack of investment , the rail emergency, the delayed renegotiation elements of fateful events. "Then he said," this was only the product of an indifference " and added," It was a human flaw and another laziness of those who are judged " highlighted in his

When he told Marcos Paz prison, where he is detained by order of Judge Luis Rodríguez for embezzling funds related to Rio Turbio coal mine, De Vido spoke of " political persecution " in the lawsuit for the tragedy of Oz of February 22, 2012, and re marked: "I am blamed solely for having been a minister"

"I can not accept for one second that I may have responsibility, this imputation is tactically impossible to sustain, "he said, reinforcing the concept. They had control were those who "were in charge of the secretariat of transport" .

This proposal was refuted by Moral who stated in his arguments that De Vido "the minister knew the disability, did not do it and had everything to improve it". He reinforced this concept by stating: " No matter what officials he had below, he can not be exempted from punishment, his guarantor position was not elusive" and considered his railway policy "was pbadive." [19659002] With regard to Simeonoff "he did not complete the contracts nor made any recommendations" since he considered that "he had knowledge of the deplorable state and that he They took no action ".

After the argument of Moral, it will be the turn of an upcoming date Leonardo Menghini, also a lawyer of a group of parents. Giving continuity to this authority, the Anti-Corruption Bureau (OA) will argue in its role of complaint, the prosecutor before the Court Juan García Elorrio and finally, the accusations of the two accused will take place: De Vido and Simeonoff.

"It is one of the largest trials faced by the TOF 4", said judicial sources in Clarín at the time of the badysis of this last section of the trial which counted, hearing after hearing, with the presence of the relatives of the victims of the incident of the Station of Once, which had already had a first trial in charge of the Federal Federal Court.

For September, according to judicial sources, the TOF 4 will be in conditions to give notice of the judgment of this judgment to which it arrived after in the first judgment it was sentenced to the ex-officials Ricardo Jaime and Juan Pablo Schiavi, and the businessman Claudio Cirigliano among others. There, it was determined that the fatal accident was caused by a combination of factors related to the lack of investment for the maintenance of the Sarmiento and the negligence of the safety with which the formations made their path.

This is because the funds for doing so have ended elsewhere. Therefore, on De Vido lies the accusation of "wreck aggravated aggravated by death".