Even though Clarín can not claim that Santiago Maldonado died on August 1

Less than a year after the enforced disappearance of Santiago Maldonado, every journalistic company refreshes the case in its own way. Clarín with the operator Claudio Andrade in the lead, attempts to reinforce the propaganda idea of ​​Casa Rosada that Maldonado simply "drowned" in the waters of the river Chubut after have run from Ruta 40 as part of the picket of the gendarmerie

On Monday, with a frenzy worthy of admiration, the pseudo-journalist won part of the cover of Magnetto's website with five articles in a row, all under the banner "A year of the death of the craftsman". Thus, at least in the presentation, Clarín has already decreed that Santiago Maldonado lost his life at noon on August 1, 2017 and at the same place where he was last seen by his fellow Mapuche. 19659002] However, the anxieties of macristas can not be completely satisfied by their scribes. For this reason, in one of his articles, under the title "Santiago Maldonado: what we know today about death in the river Chubut", Andrade must resort to certain juggling so that certain data and ideas are adapted to his interests.

When and where?

According to the note, "the experts and the judge agree" that "the young man drowned in the river and remained from August to October in the water" . But although he's trying to give the idea, he can not say forcefully that Santiago died on August 1 at noon, exactly the same place where the witnesses saw him last and that his body remained there for 78 days. next to be found on 17 October.

Even that could not be demonstrated in the court case investigating the enforced disappearance and subsequent death of the young craftsman. On the contrary, after the autopsy of Maldonado's body, many questions have been opened that have not yet been resolved regarding the time and place of his death.

Clarín is based on the basic expert conclusions that acted in the autopsy and that determined that Santiago died "by submersion in the waters of the river, this drowning aided by the 39; hypothermia. " And in this, according to some scientific calculations "the body remained under water for more than 73 days."

According to Andrade, the fact that the autopsy determined that Maldonado's body does not show a "trail" is enough to "Reject" that "could have been hit or moved in an area and then moved into the flow."

The reporter adds that a report made in "the Faculty of Natural Sciences of the UBA, establishes that the species of algae found in the heart chamber and d 39, Other parts of his body and his clothes coincided with those that were collected by river experts in December. "But he returns to maneuver according to his interests and says that" in other words, Was the water and it was the place where Maldonado died. "

No, Andrade. If you are talking about "this place" to where the body was found, it should be based on something more than the coincidence between the surrounding water and the water found in the body from Santiago. You do not know that a good part of the Chubut River in the area (this water) is located in Bennetton Land, with what does this mean? Although the water was the same, it was not necessarily drowned in those square meters which, curiously, had been raked several times by the same state before the discovery of the body.

Stories

Clarín insists on sowing multiple doubts about the testimony of members of the Mapuche community brutally repressed by the gendarmerie and human rights defenders, who have up to 39, now brought the most consistent data to the file.

At the same time, despite all the information of "first hand", it would seem that for the "big Argentine newspaper" there was no crack or contradiction between the rigged testimony of the staff who put stage repression. Much less questionable, according to his vision, the thousand and one maneuvers conducted for a whole year by officials of the Ministry of Security under the command of Patricia Bullrich.

Nothing surprising. But we must not stop saying it. Especially because the pseudo-journalist ends up launching provocation worthy of repudiation.

Boosting the anonymity of his so-called "sources", Andrade says that "members of the Esquel justice and the national government agree that the Mapuches since the beginning that Maldonado was not arrested and that in the next hours the version of the enforced Disappearance was armed with the help of K, Izquierda and Human Rights activists. [19659002] And it ends with "a very qualified voice of justice" He tells her that "the rest was a story".

Like the dog biting his tail, Andrade and those who pay his salary fight "stories" supposedly badembling their own versions of reality that are not even used to

So not serious, scary

Finally, in another article of the same clarinet, Andrade says that "one year after his death, the investigation did not progress one." But whoever tries to inform through this note on what are the most problematic points of the file that prevent precisely the course of the case, will be left unanswered.

Andrade says that "the judicial inquiry into this event has come into a lethargy that can hardly go away in the short term.There are some judicial voices that are already betting on this." Some say this spell from status quo in which he subsists will remain at least until December, while others are likely to reach the second anniversary of his death. "

Who are they who say one thing or another? We do not know. Why do they say it? Neither one nor the other And nowhere in the article does it say what is obvious and denounced the family of Santiago: that they are the representatives of the judiciary Judge Gustavo Lleral and the prosecutor Silvina Avila, who for months have prevented the case from moving to the land

The clarinist explanation of things to more than one can make think that the judicial cause n & # 39; It is not advanced by esoteric, supernatural, or paranormal questions. But it is not like that. There are very deep interests, defended at the rage of Casa Rosada and the Rural Society of Patagonia (whose Bennettons are honorable partners) that bring Andrade and his bosses to write what he writes.

It will be Claudio Andrade he has too many "sources" in power, those who are very "reliable" but who are never confronted; but he lacks the slightest confidence and the slightest connection with those who continue to demand, in a concrete manner, decided and without double intention, justice for Santiago.