Evo Morales has again indicted Bolivian lawmakers "without dignity" who oppose its perpetuation to power



[ad_1]

The president of Bolivia, Evo Morales, badured Saturday thatThe United States Senate and opposition legislators "shameful" and "without dignity" have become his "best campaign leaders" in this year's controversial elections, in which the leader will seek a fourth consecutive term despite the many criticisms received since the Constitution forbids it.

Morales made these remarks during an act of delivering tractors to farmers in Tarija, during which he badured that the US Senate, last week he issued an eight-point resolution in which he urged, among others, the Bolivian leader to respect the "constitutional limits in presidential terms", opposed to his presidency, as the newspaper reported The reason.

In addition, he criticized the "parliamentary right" for "asking his employer to intervene", after some 15 deputies of the Bolivian opposition asked the President of the United States, Donald Trump, to "intervene" with the Organization of American States (OAS) and the United States. nations of the region, to prevent Morales from running for a fourth presidential term.

"I do not know if it's embarrbading, they'll know, but we can not bother and we should be happy, now the US Senate with the right are our campaign leaders ", Morales expressed in his speech, according to The reason.

"The Bolivian right is scared and now asks for the intervention of the President of the United States. Shame, imagine, they know we're going to win, but since they can not go to Trump, that can not be understood, but it's a right, "he added.

Morales was strongly criticized by the opposition in Bolivia and by the international community for his attempt to run for a fourth consecutive term, despite the fact that the law expressly prevents and after a referendum organized by his government in 2016, he failed to try to change it in his favor.

Ignoring the Bolivian Constitution and popular expression at the polls, the president was finally allowed to participate by the Supreme Court of Bolivia, controlled by the ruling party, some still hope that this decision can be revoked befores the general elections to be held in October, and this hope is that the orders of the US Senate and opposition lawmakers come forward.

These groups of Bolivian senators and deputies Trump who "could well intercede in Latin America and prevent Evo Morales to represent the Bolivian presidency", according to a letter published Friday by The reason and dated April 1st.

They also asked Trump to intervene with the OAS so that "Talk to the international community and avoid the consolidation of the totalitarian dictatorship of Evo Morales Ayma in Bolivia".

"We are addressing your authority, as Senators and Members of Parliament and Bolivian Civic Platforms, to ask you very respectfully to intercede in Latin America and to prevent Evo Morales from returning to the Bolivian presidency", says the text signed by Carmen Eva Gonzales, Norma Piérola, Susana Campos Elio, Amilcar Barra Cabero, Alain R. Claros, Roger Martinez, Maria Anelin Suarez, Cira Castro, Enrique Siles Montesinos, Agustin Condori, Yeimi Pena, Rodrigo Valdivia Gomez , Maria Eugenia Calcina Rivero, Reina Isabel Villca and Edgar Rendon.

The Political Constitution of the Plurinational State of Bolivia, approved in 2009, clearly establishes a five-year presidential term with the possibility of a single re-election on an ongoing basis. Morales has managed to govern up to now for three terms, thus bypbading the provision, the first under the old Magna Carta and the next two according to the new regime.

But his appointment for a fourth term was almost impossible to maintain from a legal point of view, and the persistence of the president, despite the failure of the referendum, has sparked a wave of concern over the growing threat of authoritarianism in Bolivia.

"Our Republic is today in danger of democratic subsistence since its recovery in 1982 because the government of President Evo Morales has launched a judicial strike., in its quest to stay in power by trampling on our political constitution of the state and our popular sovereignty, "says the letter presented by lawmakers.

[ad_2]
Source link