[ad_1]
At the end of 2020, as the national government carried out testing and negotiations to approve the vaccine of AstraZeneca, an influence campaign – from abroad – via social networks had among its targets the Argentina, in an attempt to disparage the immunization developed by the University of Oxford.
This was the first wave of an international operation initiated by a UK registered marketing company which was managed from another country, which operated on more than ten online platforms and which went through a second phase five months later that aimed at the Pfizer.
Argentinian Facebook and Instagram users were among the objectives of this operation. disinformation, which was also directed against inhabitants of India, other Latin American countries and, to a lesser extent, the United States, according to an investigation revealed on Tuesday by the company Facebook itself during a press conference.
Social network researchers have found links between this operation and Fazzé, a UK-registered marketing company “whose operations were mostly run from Russia,” according to the social network report.
“We don’t have the detailed country-by-country (campaign) reach. However, beyond borders, the reach was low,” he said. Nathaniel likes, Head of Security Policy at Facebook.
No paid advertisements aimed at Argentine users were found as part of the campaign, according to a request from the agency. David Agranovitch, director of Threat Interruption of the social network.
In other words, the operation failed to develop a significant audience, even though it showed how some broadcast campaigns fake news and deliberately misinform via the Internet.
In its various phases, the operation combined the publication of memes with hashtags such as #AstraZenecamiente and phrases that claimed, for example, that “the vaccine was based on a chimpanzee gene from the company AstraZeneca“.
“This campaign served as a disinformation machine,” said the survey, and specifies that its promoters “have created deceptive articles and petitions in various forums such as Reddit, Way, Changer.org Yes Medapply.co.uk.“
Then they used fake accounts on social networks like Facebook and Instagram to sow and amplify this content from outside the platform, using crude spam tactics, ”he continues.
This type of campaign – which is being developed simultaneously on several platforms – makes, according to Same, that for each company or social network, it is a real challenge to see the whole and to carry out common actions, even if their authors “leave traces through the Internet and expose themselves”.
In any case, the center of this operation was to contact influencers “with audiences already developed on Instagram, YouTube and TikTok to publish content and use specific hashtags without revealing the origin of the posts”, describes the book.
In fact, it was influencers who made this activity known in France and Germany, and they played a key role in exposing the first clue and thus allowing to discover the full extent of the disinformation network.
The company founded by Mark Zuckerberg As a result of this investigation, he deleted a total of 65 Facebook accounts and 243 Instagram accounts, which had approximately 24,000 followers.
The campaign went through two different times.
The first, between November and December 2020, involved the posting of memes and comments warning of the supposed danger of the vaccine. AstraZeneca under the false claim that it was derived from a chimpanzee adenovirus.
It started with the creation of two groups of fake Facebook accounts in late 2020, “possibly from account farms in Bangladesh and Pakistan,” the report notes, although it notes that “they posted claiming be in India “.
At first, little content was posted, unrelated to the coronavirus and focused on Indian cuisine and Hollywood actors.
But in late November, “the operation used some of those accounts to post content on blogging platforms and petition sites, including Medium and Change.org,” in which it focused on one argument: that AstraZeneca he had tampered with his test data and used untested technology to create it.
These requests were then forwarded to Facebook via fake accounts, which used memes based on “Planet of the Apes” cartoons.
On Instagram, by contrast, the activity was “raw” and spammy. Around hashtags against AstraZenecaBetween December 14 and 21, around 10,000 posts were created, many with links outside the platform.
Social network researchers consider that this step had some automation and lack of care, as revealed by the fact that the same memes were used first in Hindi and then in Spanish.
These publications ceased on January 6, after Argentina, India and Brazil approved the use of the vaccine. AstraZeneca.
Last May, as authorities in Brazil and the European Union discussed the approval of the vaccine Pfizer among adolescents, began the barrage of messages against the American laboratory, based on the false argument that this drug had generated a “rate of victims” higher than the others.
This second phase was based on a supposed 12-page document prepared by AstraZeneca who compared the effectiveness of different vaccines, according to research.
The text in question, according to the fake news published on Medium, Reddit and Eticalhacker, it would have leaked during a hack at the Mexican laboratory.
Days later, a fake account was added to a Facebook medical forum for UK students and posted the allegedly hacked document.
“The next day, a second wave of articles appeared on third-party sites to position the story of the ‘index of victims of Pfizer‘”, details the report.
This second stage was done mainly by posting in English and aimed at the United States.
Although she had a low volume of posts, part of the operation was to send detailed information to influencers on TikTok, YouTube and Instagram along with campaign arguments.
“This attempt to reach influencers turned out to be the end of the matter. Instead of taking money from Fazzé (according to reports, around 2,000 euros), a French influencer and another German denounced the campaign, ”indicates the survey.
Among the unresolved questions, remains the identity of the person who mandated the marketing company to carry out the transaction.
.
[ad_2]
Source link