Naaju Breaking News, Live Updates, Latest Headlines, Viral News, Top Stories, Trending Topics, Videos
[ad_1]
The prestigious magazine Forbes today published an article by cybersecurity journalist Zak Doffman urging users to exit the app Facebook Messenger.
?? We all know that Facebook he lives off our data, that’s how we pay for his supposedly free services. But there must be a limit. If we find ourselves in a position where Facebook He says, “I’ll keep as much as I can,” and we agree, what does that say about us and how much we value our own privacy, ”Doffman says.
In his opinion, the poorly managed public relations and poor communication that led to the decision of thousands of users to migrate WhatsApp a Signal O Telegram, distracts attention from the privacy breach you commit Facebook Messenger.
Doffman states that the big difference between WhatsApp and Messenger is that if the former cannot see private messages, the latter does.
To make this point, he refers to research by cybersecurity experts Tommy Mysk and Talaj Haj Bakr who showed that the app was downloading private attachments to their own servers.
?? the problem that Messenger Access to your private information is easily resolved, is it end-to-end encryption?
While WhatsApp, encrypts end-to-end messages, Messenger Only those sent between two people are recognized as private messages, but not within groups and, in fact, it is not enabled by default. You have to select the option to start working.
Is it this lack of end-to-end encryption that makes the Messenger it does not serve me. This should be the default for the email platform you are using. Own Facebook warned of the risks associated with the absence of this type of encryption, and WhatsApp deserves great recognition for having universal access, making end-to-end encryption accessible to 2 billion users ?? Doffman.
According to his analysis: one of the ironies of the reaction of WhatsApp is that users exit this application, which is end-to-end encrypted by default, to Telegram, which is not ??, warns.
Although in 2019, the integration between Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram, we expected Messenger turned into an end-to-end encryption system – but two years later we haven’t seen any tangible progress. However, what we have seen is the start of this integration, starting with Messenger and Instagram, with no security improvements in sight, accuses.
Facebook assured last year that he was still very committed to doing Messenger is end-to-end encrypted by default ??. Jay Sullivan from Facebook assured before the Senate committee in 2019 that people should be able to communicate securely and privately with their friends and relatives without anyone, including Facebook, listen to or monitor their conversations ??.
Sullivan said users should be able to submit medical and financial information “with confidence that it won’t fall into the hands of identity thieves or other malicious people.” But, Forbes warn that Messenger monitors content, and what? health and fitness ?, ?? sensitive information ?? and ?? financial informations ?? are part of the mass of user data fields that can be collected through Messenger.
?? The practices of Facebook they are now visible to everyone, they are not buried in the fine print of the privacy policy. We can all see the ridiculous difference between Messenger and other platforms, although we don’t yet understand how that metadata is monetized and used to target us with ads, Doffman continues.
The advice is now simple. If you’re still on Messenger or using Instagram DMs for anything other than casual contacts, it’s time for a change. The simplest option remains WhatsApp. If you want a more secure option, run Signal in parallel. It will be more useful as more contacts join, ”concludes the journalist.
This way with WhatsApp and Signal, the user will be covered in terms of security and privacy and, from their perspective, over time, they will end up using Signal by default.
(Source package: Infobae)
.
[ad_2]
Source link
