He found himself without his wife’s inheritance to rebuild his life with someone else



[ad_1]

At Corunna, Spain, a man lost it heritage which belonged to his wife because he remade his life with another person. The widower not only did not have this money income, but also was continued by her ex-sister-in-law, who initially lost the legal battle.

The signatory of the will wrote the text in 1975, where he specified that the husband would retain the quality of heir as long as this “Not to remarry”. “In the event that Don C. contracts a new marriage, the institution made in his favor will be ineffective”, explains the document, according to the judgment.

“The judgment obliges the defendant to return the inheritance property to the sister of the deceased, declaring null transfers which could have been made on said property”, explained the last judgment. (Photo: Pixabay)

To the deceased’s sister, who initially lost his legal battle, his request was rejected because, indeed, his former brother-in-law had not remarried, despite the fact that it was proven that the man was living with another woman.

But, to the widower’s surprise, his previous sister-in-law showed up in court, where the sentence was revised and changed the feeling of failure.

There is a reality, and it is that the heir so far has not entered into a legal marriage with his new partner. Despite this, there was a “more uxorio” or civil union this jurisprudence perfectly matches married life.

The man considers that the court which heard the case first did not appropriate assessment of evidence. The said documents, according to the sentence, prove “an affective relationship and a conjugal appearance, with a usual and stable”, So it was A setback for the widower.

On the other hand, the drafter of wills, now subject to judicial review, died in 1996, a few decades after they were written. This is why it is surprising, in this sense, that the sentence takes for granted that the relationship between man and his second partner began “at the end of the eighties of the last century”.

Coincidentally, the deceased’s sister filed this lawsuit just five years after the man’s second partner die.

“The penalty obliges the defendant to return to the deceased’s sister the property of the succession, declaring null the transfers which could have been made on the aforementioned property ”, was explained in the last judgment.

.

[ad_2]
Source link