He is 41 and sued his parents to support him

A 41-year-old man from London, England, starred in a case considered “unprecedented” by the United Kingdom courts: he sued his parents for life-long financial aid because, he said. supported, they had made him very dependent.

Lawyers from Faiz Siddiqui -the plaintiff, a graduate of the University of Oxford- said the judge had the power to order his client’s parents to continue providing him with financial support. They were based on the laws relating to marriage and children. But the magistrate had already anticipated last year that he did not think the same thing, to the point that he promptly rejected a first request.

“This is a very unusual case. In fact, as far as I know, and the very experienced lawyers who have appeared before me do not dispute it, the case is unprecedented,” the judge said a few months ago. . James munby in his decision.

The advocate of man, Tim amos, said his parents are “Very rich” and that they could easily pay for whatever support the court could reasonably order. He also assured that they have “fed their addiction” towards them for 20 years.

Part of his parents ‘financial support consisted of letting him live in a stylish central London loft that is his (the parents’) property, and until recently they paid him the bills for housing services, according to what BBC Media publishes. According to real estate experts, this house costs 1.6 million US dollars.

Siddiqui is a person who has suffered from mental disorders in recent years. Sir James said he suffered from “various mental health issues and disabilities” and had been unemployed since 2011. In addition, he he lives in London and his parents in Dubai.

“These elderly parents have their take on what it’s like to support a ‘difficult, demanding and stubborn’ child,” he said. Justin warshaw, The lawyer for Rakshanda and Javed, the parents.

However, it was also known that he had started his legal action to move from a modern history degree to a qualified lawyer and have a master’s degree in taxation.

In 2020, the decision of the English Supreme Court judge was forceful: dismissed the case and ordered the complainant to pay his parents the sum of $ 77,000 to cover legal fees. He said that the law was clear as for an adult child “should not be able to sue his parents to obtain food financing”.

The magistrate stressed that, for legal reasons, the court was not competent to grant requests for parental maintenance either by the law of matrimonial causes, nor by the law of minors or by the law of human rights. .

And as if that weren’t enough, Judge Munby refused permission to appeal this claim. However, Siddiqui plans to continue the litigation in other courts until what, he says, “is fairer.”

The lawsuit against his parents was not the only one Siddiqui had initiated. In 2018 a lawsuit against Oxford University, the study house where he obtained his law degree.

Siddiqui’s almost absurd argument was that the “Inadequate teaching” From Oxford he was not received with the highest marks and, therefore, he could not enter universities in the United States. The case was dismissed.

Also watch

Also watch

TOPICS APPEARING IN THIS NOTE