How Emma Coronel spent hours waiting for the sentence of her husband "El Chapo" Guzmán



[ad_1]

Emma Coronel awaits her husband's sentence at a New York hotel, while the jury deliberates on the 10 counts he faces Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán in a Brooklyn yard.

The defense will inform Coronel whether he is to appear in court or not, while waiting at his hotel or in another space because Sources say that he felt the pressure of the media and people attending the trial "El Chapo".

This has been confirmed by the lawyer Eduardo Balarezo to express a question about the wife of the Mexican., noting the absence in Emma's test room, where other defenders Jeffrey Lichtman and William Purpura are present.

At the place where Coronel usually sits, there were other people and behind them were Mexican couple Julio and Carmen Gaitán., who has already been seen several times during the trial and always greets the wife of "El Chapo".

Yesterday, Emma Coronel was at court all day, where she acknowledged being nervous, but refused to give interviews and is waiting for the decision of the 12 New Yorkers who will decide on her husband's future. Leaving the federal building, the beautiful exreina did not answer the questions of more than a dozen media pending resolution of the jury.

Guzmán Loera's lawyer, Lichtman, has shown himself optimistic about the delay in the jury's verdict, although he does not clarify the reasons, because this delay could be looked at just a data on methamphetamine, which is part of the second charge.

The 12 jurors examine the statements of Juan Aguayo, border patrol officer, who participated in an operation during which three men were arrested and trying to enter marijuana packages on the beach of San Diego, to whom "El Chapo "ordered to call a lawyer.

However, the delay of the jury is due more to the testimony of the Colombian brothers Jorge and Alex Cifuentes, since he asked to see them again.

Judge Brian Cogan told the jury that he would have access to the records without the parties' objections.but they should take more account of what they heard live during witness statements

They did not specify whether the eight women and four men on the jury would read the hundreds of pages of the two testimonies.

[ad_2]
Source link