[ad_1]
In fact, this call for moderation is a strategy to keep the muscle as alert as possible with the PRO, radicals and Elisa Carrió for the remaining time until the election.
In this type of reasoning, Carrió (very serene and optimistic, according to internal history), Rogelio Frigerio, Marcos Peña, Gerardo Morales, Luis Naidenoff, Maria Eugenia Vidal, Horacio Rodriguez Larreta, Patricia Bullrich, Federico Pinedo and Miguel Pichetto have been mixed.
The entire campaign movement Together for Change revolves around the adventures of the IMF delegation in the country and the results of this review of the goals. That is why, yesterday, an official eye was placed on the meeting of the Fund with Alberto Fernandez.
What does the government think of Alberto F.'s strategy? In the first place, the discourse is questioned, which is one of the most complicated problems to deal with for the Peronist candidate who must find a balance between moderation and internal pressure. "One day he speaks for La Cámpora and Cristina and another for the school", reasoned with this newspaper one of the visitors of the Rosada. They believe that the ultimate goal of Alberto F. is that the IMF finally blocks the payment of $ 5420 million, at least until the appointment of a new government. This option would be pithy for the trust of the system.
Whether this exercise exists or not and that the harshness of the Peronist candidate is due to internal tensions or personal conviction is a central and essential issue of contemporary politics. That is, it sets the tone that the new government will take Alberto Fernandez, if the polls confirm what the STEP says. And a strategic food of this unknown is the studied silence of Cristina de Kirchner. Others, in Kirchnerism, have not maintained this silence (which for the functionalism "crippling") and have screwed up (and much) as the well-known case of Felipe Solá and the return of the National Board of Cereals, just as Alberto F. had won over the main agricultural places.
Another key element of these arguments is the statement made yesterday in the Rosada del "Right to fight". The mere mention is perhaps a clear sign of weakness, but the government triggers two final definitions, developed between the radicals after the meeting:
"The best candidate Macri is the best president of Macri who strives to remove economic uncertainties", They say, maybe do not understand the epic that means.
And a final proclaimed by those who have the habit of losing elections and surviving on the benches of Congress: "The ballot is the guarantee of the absence of concentration of power. One thing is that I win in the first round and another very different ballot ". The cannons point there.
.
[ad_2]
Source link