Mapuche leader Jones Huala was placed under house arrest

During his vote, Judge Alejandro Slokar said that "… his elusive attitude was demonstrated in the process followed in the Republic of Chile, where he joined and violated many of the advantages of his freedom of consultation, which was then be revoked, motivating the warrant of arrest and subsequent extradition request. "

He agreed with his colleague Ana María Figueroa on the possibility of applying a light prison.

The magistrate in relation to the subsidiary claim for the application of a measure of moralisation of the preventive detention, noted that: "… in the particular circumstances of the case and in response to the above-mentioned legislation and case law, the requested house arrest with the addition of an electronic control device under section 33, a reasonable measure to be badessed, guaranteeing the Subjugation of the accused to the process … "

Judge Eduard Riggi understood that it was appropriate to confirm the rejection of the release.

Similarly, in his minority vote, Judge Riggi rejected the late and new house arrest application for several reasons.

He felt that the claim was absolutely inadmissible because the situation of Francisco Facundo Jones Huala did not fit into any of the legally-planned cases to accede to this claim.