Margarita Stolbizer asked Cristina Kirchner to be interrogated for presumption of illegal espionage

The former national deputy Margarita Stolbizer he asked the federal judge Marcelo Martínez de Giorgi who quotes during the interrogation Cristina Kirchner by the discovery of telephone tapping recordings during a descent into the house of the former president in El Calafate.

According to the presentation made by Stolbizer through his lawyer, Silvina Martínez, the documents discovered reveal an illegal espionage activity. These are reports on the company's "House to House", which would be related to Antonio Stiusoand the federal judge Sandra Arroyo Salgado, their badets, their income and their entry and exit from the country.

According to the brief presented by Martinez, during the raid on the house of the former president in El Calafate, which took place from 24 to 26 August last year, recordings of Telephone tapping on the cause of death of the agent were also recorded. Pedro Viale intelligence – known as "The lauchón"- and documents related to the company Glencore, mentioned in the case of parallel customs with Venezuela.

In addition, a recording of a telephone conversation concerning Enarsa and the purchase of fuels was found. In this document it is emphasized that they should buy in favor of a manager a company prevented from directly participating in the procurement.

Among the many documents containing telephone tapping records found in Cristina Kirchner's house are reports on various companies, including YPF, Barrick Gold, Citigroup, General Motors and Grupo Clarín's shareholder investments.

In the letter, Stolbizer stated that "the seriousness of the documents found in Cristina Kirchner's house reveals a prolonged practice of illegal espionage ordered by the former President of the Nation, who resorts to intelligence practices conducted outside the principles established by the National Constitution and the rule of law that show the commission of a series of crimes. "

Stolbizer therefore requested the interrogation of the former head of state on charges of illegal espionage and also sought leave to intervene in the case "amicus curiae"in order to collaborate by providing research elements.