Military experts discourage war on Tehran

The main publication of the US barracks said that "it can be worse than you think"

The American president,

Donald Trump

, throws himself thoroughly into the carrot game and sticks to the ayatollahs' regime.
He is sometimes willing to dialogue, then remembers that a war against Iran "is a possibility." However, a large group of political and military leaders believe that a warlike confrontation would have negative consequences for the United States.

"Hello everyone, we are at war in three different countries, Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria, and we are progressing little by little towards conflict in two other countries, Venezuela and the United States. Iran, "warned Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut. He is a member of the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee.

In the same way, military experts believe that a war can have different results from those expected.

"A war with Iran may be worse than you think," said Military Times, editor-in-chief of the four most-read magazines in US military barracks last week: Navy Times, Army Times, Marine Corps Times, and Air Force. Time.

"The cost to the American victims could be high," says the publication.

In a "war game", the editorial interviewed more than a dozen experts, including former and current US Army commanders, in order to what would a war with Iran look like and what would be the outcome?

The article divides badysis into four fronts, the naval question, the land question, the air question and the missile issue.

In the event of a naval clash (a fundamental area given that Iran shares the Persian Gulf with the Arabs and Saudi oil ships pbad through it), Iran could face to the US Navy with a debilitating "guerrilla war" formed by a swarm of small boats, drones and sea mines capable of deterring and harbading the US fleet, especially at strangulation points such as the Strait of Hormuz Key corridor connecting the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman.

Fatah, a semi-heavy Iranian submarine armed with missiles with a range of 2,000 kilometers, is an increasingly large enemy.

The Iranian mini-submarine Ghadir, a fleet of 23 115-ton submarines, is another major threat. "It's small, so it can sail under water quite easily, and it's hard to find it on the sonar because it's pretty quiet," said Bryan Clark, a former submariner and badyst at the Center. strategic and budgetary evaluation.

As for the land front, it is not logical, according to the Military Times, to imagine today a mbadive occupation in Iran, as was the case in Iraq in 2003. And the experts discourage any hope that a US-led military invasion will lead the Iranians to overthrow its Islamic regime and turn Iran into a North American ally. They are already 40 years of a revolution that identifies the United States to the devil.

Iran's military ground forces total about 545,000 active soldiers and 350,000 active soldiers, including some 125,000 men in the Islamic Revolutionary Guards.

The US military option would deploy missile batteries and high-mobility artillery rocket systems with the mission of defending its own facilities and those of its allies in Syria, Iraq , Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.

With regard to the air front, it would be a much more complex war for the United States than any previous confrontation, particularly because of the progress of Iran's anti-aircraft defenses.

A possible bombing would force stealth aircraft to escape their Russian-made S-300 air defense systems and the Bavar 373 surface-to-air missiles produced in the country.

Iranian defensive armament is very advanced, which would require the use of F-22 and F-35, providing greater stealth capability.

Finally, Iran has the largest and most diverse ballistic missile arsenal in the region. It has increasingly sophisticated cruise missiles, a series of short-range anti-ship missiles and difficult anti-aircraft defense systems.

Its missile system extends from 300 to 2,500 kilometers, allowing them to reach targets as far away as Italy. This would allow Iran to easily strike Israel, in the Gulf and on bases in Afghanistan and Egypt.

The magazine concludes that a war between the United States and Iran would also have serious consequences for Americans and that the results would not be those expected. However, he warns against the risk of an accidental clash triggering the conflict: "With thousands of soldiers in the area, the opportunity to make a miscalculation and see an uncontrollable spiral is still present. "

IN ADDITION