[ad_1]
When Rebecca Firlit She attended a virtual hearing earlier this month with her ex-husband, the Chicago mom hoping the process would focus on child support. But the judge had other plans.
“One of the first things he asked me was whether or not I was vaccinated“, noted Firlit, 39 years old, at Chicago Sun-Times.
It was nothe said, explaining that have had “adverse reactions to vaccines in the past” and a doctor advised her not to be vaccinated against the coronavirus. “Poses a risk“He added.
County judge to cook, James shapiro, then took what the parents’ lawyers called an unprecedented decision: said the mother couldn’t see her 11-year-old son until he was vaccinated. The child’s father is vaccinatedreported the Sun-Times.
Firlit appeals the judge’s decision. Your lawyer, Annette fernholz, who did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Washington Post late Sunday he told the TV channel WFLD What the decision was an overtaking. “The father did not even take this case to courtFernholz said. “It is therefore the judge alone who makes this decision that he cannot see his son until he is vaccinated.”.
Judges in other states have handed down lesser sentences to defendants who choose to be vaccinated or have required the vaccine as a condition of release from prison for some inmates. A judge at the 19th East Baton Rouge Judicial District Court offered some defendants the option of getting vaccinated instead of doing community service hours.
Two Ohio judges have also ordered that some people receive the vaccine as a condition of their parole. Likewise, two Georgian judges reduced the sentences of certain offenders who were vaccinated. In New York City, justices in the Bronx and Manhattan ordered that the defendants be vaccinated as part of their rehabilitation and as a condition of applying for bail, respectively.
Corn Chicago judge’s sentence appears to be the first of its kind. Firlit and her ex-husband, Matthieu Colombes, have been divorced for seven years, according to WFLD. Court documents show that have shared custody of their 11-year-old son since June 2014.
Neither Firlit nor Duiven immediately responded to the Post’s request for comment on Sunday evening.
The August 10 hearing had nothing to do with the review of the custody agreement, Firlit’s lawyer said, so no one expected the judge to ask the mother of the child if she was vaccinated. Firlit said she was intrigued by the judge’s question.
“I was confused because it was only supposed to be about expenses and child support», He said to Sun-Times. “I asked him what he had to do with the hearing, and he said, “I am the judge and I make the decisions in your case.‘”.
The judge then revoked custody of his son until she is fully vaccinated. Firlit has not indicated if he will be vaccinated, corn says he’s appealing the decision because he feels that the judge has overstepped his duties. He added that taking a child from its mother was “wrong”.
“I think it divides families“, noted Firlit a WFLD. “And I think it’s not the best thing for my son to be away from his mother”.
Father’s lawyer, Jeffery M. Leving, who did not immediately respond to the Post’s request for comment on Sunday night, said he did not expect the judge to ask questions about vaccines or change the custody agreement. But said that supported the judge’s decision. “There are children who have died from covid“, noted life. “I think all children should be safe. And I’m okay with the mother getting vaccinated”.
In recent months, the number of children who have contracted the highly contagious delta variant has increased exponentially, according to American Academy of Pediatrics. American Academy of Family Physicians also warned that there is a growing risk that unvaccinated children experience “severe and lasting impacts” on their health.
Firlit said she was struggling to part with her son, who she could only communicate with by phone. “I talk to him every day», He said to Sun-Times. “Cry, miss me”.
KEEP READING:
[ad_2]
Source link