Naaju Breaking News, Live Updates, Latest Headlines, Viral News, Top Stories, Trending Topics, Videos
[ad_1]
According to recent information, the Wuhan Institute of Virology He has been involved in an animal virus detection project run by civilian and military scientists, although the Chinese regime has denied such links. This laboratory is currently reported by several experts as the place of origin of the new coronavirus and of which there is still no certainty about its origin.
As PThe main proof of the relationship that existed between the Chinese government and the Wuhan laboratory is the participation of Colonel Cao Wuchun, a senior military officer and government adviser on bioterrorism, under a program called Wild Animal Pathogens Discovery, which was launched in 2012 and was taking place at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
The project was funded by the National Foundation of Natural Sciences of China.
Its objective was to find and classify pathogens capable of infecting humans and to study their evolution, according to documents obtained by the British newspaper The Mail on Sunday and viewed by Infobae.
In turn, the project was led neither more nor less than by Xu Jianguo, who was later one of those responsible for carrying out investigations in Wuhan to determine how dangerous the new virus was and what its origin was, which it is natural or artificial. So, he was the scientist who led the first group of experts to investigate the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in December 2019.
This outbreak is limited and will end if there are no new cases next week, Jianguo said.
Another of the project members who researched viruses of animal origin was the same director of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Shi Zhengli, who was oddly known by her nickname “batwoman”, due to her travels. constant.
Now, with this tripartite relationship between Cao, the senior army officer; Xu Jianguo, project manager; and Shi Zhengli, director of the lab, at least the relationship between the Chinese government and the lab would already be proven. However, official coffers have categorically denied the now proven relationship.
Some data or controversial points are that the Wuhan laboratory, for example, he disconnected his virus sample database just in September 2019, just a little bit weeks before cases of covid erupted in the city.
After the World Health Organization sent a delegation of experts to investigate the origins of the virus in Wuhan, and that it would return, as the entity claimed, with a great lack of rigorous data, several governments around the world, such as the Britain, the United States and others, criticized Beijing for refusing to share key data and samples after doubts left by a joint study.
Doubt that the Chinese government lied by denying an official relationship with the Labortario remains clear. On the other hand, there remains the suspicion of why they wanted to prevent this relationship from being known.
As Infobae quotes, The Chinese have made it clear that they see biotechnology as an important part of the future of war hybrid. The big question is whether your work in these areas is offensive or defensive, in the words of David Asher, an expert in biological, chemical and nuclear proliferation who led State Department investigations into the origins of Covid- 19.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
