Naaju Breaking News, Live Updates, Latest Headlines, Viral News, Top Stories, Trending Topics, Videos
[ad_1]
I was not the favorite. Everyone bet Romeby Alfonso Cuarón. So why did he win? Green paper? Whatever the qualities of the film starring Viggo Mortensen, let's make a guess.
The voting system in the region implies that voters number from 1 to 8 the candidate films. It's not enough to have multiple "1's", if later you get a lot "5". A movie with several "2" or "3" is the winner.
In the first row of rock | We bring you stories of artists and songs that you must know.
Every Thursday.
First of all, there was the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor for Mahershala Ali. Then, the best original script. But when Rome won the award for best foreign language film it was obvious that Cuarón's film would not take also the statuette of the best film.
It was a lot.
Come this hug. Viggo (you can see the shield of San Lorenzo) and director Peter Farrelly. REUTERS / Mike Blake
So he won Green paper, the movie that in the predictions pleased the members of the Hollywood Academy.
We have already said it. Rome it's a foreign movie – so it's shown with subtitles in the US – and black and white.
It was a lot.
At the Mexican Alfonso Cuarón receives the Oscar for best director of his compatriot Guillermo del Toro, who won it last year. REUTERS / Mike Blake
Green paper, also a very good achievement, tackles racism, touches on homobaduality. And it's a feel good movie, the film that is good for the audience.
It can not be for Cuarón or for Netflix, which did not produce it. So it's not a Netflix movie, no matter how much Rome it is seen in streaming because it was bought in Cuarón already finished.
What would have happened if Rome I won the best movie? What was the message of the Academy to the big houses of Hollywood production?
.
[ad_2]
Source link
