Parents have installed surveillance cameras in their son's bedroom to prevent him from masturbating

The parents of a 15-year-old in Alaska decided to install a security cameras in the favorite places of the young at home with the intention of prevent him from masturbating.

It all started when the boy's father discovered him exploring his body early this month. So the boy decided this week to ask for help in the legal advice section of the Reddit social network.

"What can I do? I'm 15 and I think I should be allowed to touch my body. It's shameful and destroys my privacy, help me please, "wrote the young man.

He explained that his parents They installed cameras in their room and in the bathroom, after his father entered without knocking on the door and started screaming at him when he saw the scene.

"My father and my mother have sat down to tell me I did not have permission to touch me ", wrote the boy from Alaska whose parents opposed the badual activity before the marriage.

In fact, they prevented me from attending bad education clbades at school and they only allowed me to learn a little bit about them. " Internet.

After discovering the amazon package with surveillance cameras, he confronted his father, who had warned him that Every day they checked the recording to make sure he was not masturbating.

Under Reddit, messages of support and advice soon appeared, indicating what your privacy rights are when you go to the bathroom or change your clothes.

An attorney told the Daily Mail that the situation was destructive and that someone might point out to them that it was not child badgraphy, even though parents did not have it. Intended to install the cameras.

However, it is unlikely that the young man could be evicted from the house because he would need strong arguments and evidence. After presenting his case, no further details regarding the young man were known.

Legal recourse will allow you to enter your school without having to comply with the regulations in which it is stated that you must use short hair. For this reason, the teenager has been denied access to the school three times.
Federal Judge Alberto González determined that the rules imposed by educational authorities through which teenagers are forced to go to school with a specific haircutviolates young people's individual guarantees of discrimination on grounds of bad, restriction of education and free development of personality, since hairdressing is not involved in the development of adolescents.