Passages between Grabois and the officials for their words on parades in favor of Macri

Security Minister Patricia Bullrich said today that social leader Juan Grabois has objected to protesters who marched on Saturday in favor of the government, whom he called "a people". to the feeling of gorilla ", inscribed in the" logic of Kirchnerism ". "to think the country in terms of" friends and foes "or" good and bad. "Education Minister Alejandro Finocchiaro has also done the same, accusing the leader of the Confederation of workers of the popular economy to be "a good boy who believes himself monopolized in the street and who becomes popular trying to eat as he pleases".

Bullrich said that "if Grabois thinks that, what he does, he generates the logic that Kirchnerism had, both of them, friends and enemies, good and bad, Argentines who must be recognized as such, and those who do not. "

Before the journalistic consultation, the official went even further, since she badessed Grabois – a reference of the Confederation of Workers of the People's Economy (Ctep), aligned with Kirnerism – constitutes "a deepening the sense of division of the Argentines we do not know. " we share for nothing. "

More on this topic

Finocchiaro had said earlier that the government was in favor of "the demonstration of the people, without disturbing anyone and in a peaceful way". Then he pointed to Grabois, of strong connection with Kirchnerism. "I do not understand that people were disturbed by what happened Saturday.It was something peaceful, a demonstration of citizenship.It's even less a brave man who thinks he has the monopoly of the street and who becomes popular trying to eat what he has ". , crossed.

The head of social affairs said about the Saturday demonstration in the Plaza de Mayo that "the picture I saw is a mobilization of people with the feeling of gorilla, very old in Argentina, harmful, usually much more violent than the Peronist. "

More on this topic

The minister said, on the other hand, that "the citizens who went to protest freely left their home, were generally in family, alone and respectable (like the others) and had to be respected".

"This desire to stigmatize or characterize them is something that does not seem right to us," concluded Bullrich.