Pope Francis and Sheikh al-Azhar claim that misinterpretation of religious texts and poverty are grounds for terrorism

Pope Francis and the great Sheikh of Al Azhar, Ahmed el-Tayeb, have published a "Document on human fraternity for peace and coexistence in the world". The document is so full of lies, inaccuracies, illusions and wishful thinking that one could expect a practitioner of Taqiyya (deception) just like Sheikh el-Tayeb and somebody. Who wants so much to be deceived as Pope Francis.

Some of the impossible reasons for which any thoughtful person should be wary of el-Tayeb's sincerity are notoriously false in the document itself. To know:
The document states: "Terrorism is deplorable and threatens the security of people all over the world, causing panic, fear and pessimism, but this is not due to religion, even when terrorists invoke it. owes to an accumulation of incorrect interpretations of religious and political texts related to hunger, poverty, injustice, oppression and the honor of cities ".

The paragraph is clearly false from absolute lie. It must stop authorizing and supporting terrorist movements fueled by funding, the supply of weapons and, above all, by unfounded attempts to justify these groups, even through the media. All terrorist actions must be considered international crimes threatening peace and security in the world. Terrorism must be condemned in all its forms and expressions.
The document states: "Terrorism is due to an accumulation of incorrect interpretations of religious texts and policies relating to hunger, poverty, injustice, oppression and discrimination. 39; honor. "

So, considering what Islamic schools think of the war against non-Muslims, we can ask Sheikh al-Tayeb: Are authoritative sources of Islam, schools and Sunni jurisprudence (madhahib) all incorrect in their interpretation of the Qur'an? and the Suna? This, by virtue of what these schools say about jihad against non-Muslims, namely:

Shafi School: The Shafi Islamic Law Book was certified in 1991 by the Religious of Al-Azhar University, one of the leading authorities of the Islamic world, as a reliable guide of Sunni orthodoxy; stipulates about jihad that "The caliph is allowed to wage war against Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians until they become Muslims or pay the tax on non-Muslims."

Sheikh Nuh Ali Salman, a Jordanian expert in Islamic jurisprudence, added a paragraph to the book that states: "The caliph can only wage war when he first invited Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians to enter Islam with faith and practice, and he did not not do it, it will force them to enter the lower social order of Islam. pay "tax" (Yizya) to be able to live as non-Muslims on the land of l & # 39; ;Islam. The whole Ali Salman is known as the Umdat al-Salik fatwa.

Of course, today there is no Grand Caliph. As a result, the statement that has been repeated often since Osama bin Laden's entry into al-Qaeda and his criminal actions was that Osama and those who followed him had unlawfully released Jihad, no state authority having authorized his jihad. But they explained their actions in terms of defensive jihad, which does not need the authority of the state to be authorized and delivered, and becomes "obligatory for all believers" (Umdat al- Salik) if a Muslim land is attacked.

However, the ultimate goal of defensive jihad is not peaceful coexistence with non-Muslims on an equal footing: Umdat al-Salik specifies that the war against non-Muslims should continue until At the "return of Jesus, he returns". After that, "nothing but Islam will be accepted by all, since the tax (Yizya) is only effective until the descent of Jesus".

Hanafi School: A Hanafi Handbook of Islamic Law repeats the same precepts. He insists that people should be called to embrace Islam before being fought, "because the prophet thus instructed his commanders and ordered them to call the infidels to the faith ". Stresses that jihad should not be used for economic gain, but only for religious reasons. Therefore, from the call to Islam, "people will find that they are attacked for religious reasons and not to seize their possessions or make their own children of slaves, and with this consideration, they might be led to accept the call, be saved from the destruction of war. "

However, "if the infidels, after receiving the call, do not consent or do not agree to pay the tax (Yizya), it is up to Muslims to seek help from God and to to make war, because Allah badists those who serve him and is the destroyer of his enemies, the infidels, it is therefore necessary to implore their help on every occasion, the Prophet further orders that it be done ". (Al-Hidayah, Hanafi Handbook, page II.40)

Maliki School: Ibn Khaldoun (1332-1406), historian and Islamic philosopher also law theorist, presented in his famous Muqaddimah, the first work of historical theory, notes that "in the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and the obligation to convert everyone to Islam, either by persuasion or by force. "

Khaldun emphasizes insistently that in Islam, the head of religious affairs should be concerned about "politics of power" because gaining power over other nations is an obligation of Islam. "

Hanbali School: Ibn Taymiyya (1263-1328) was Hanbali's most important jurist (Taqi al-Din Ahmad ibn Taymiyyah). Taymiyya is considered the great medieval theorist of what is commonly called radical Islam or Islamic fundamentalism. He defined that "war is essentially an obligation and has defined it as jihad". According to this definition, religion is totally of God and his word is the most important. Therefore, in accordance with this position, all Muslims must unite and fight to destroy all those who oppose the goal of establishing the religion of Allah on earth. ".

This is also taught by modern scholars of Islam. One of the most important was Majid Khadduri, an Iraqi scholar of Islamic law of international renown. In his book "War and Peace in the Law of Islam," published in 1955 and still one of the most lucid and enlightening books on the subject, Khadduri says the following about jihad : "The state, considered the instrument of universalizing a certain religion must be a constantly expanding state".

The Islamic State, whose main function is to put into practice the law of God, has attempted to make Islam the dominant and ruling ideology worldwide.. Therefore, jihad is used both as an instrument for the universalization of religion and for the establishment of an imperial state. (Page: 51)

Imran Ahsan Khan Nyazee, Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Sharia and Law of the Islamic International University of Islamabad. In his book "Methodology of Jihad", published in 1994, he quotes Maliki Ibn Rushd, a lawyer of the twelfth century, who said: "Muslim jurists must agree that the purpose of fighting with" the people of the book "is one of the two things: a) his conversion to Islam, b) the payment of Yizya. "

Nyazee concludes: "There is no doubt that the main objective of the Muslim community, in the eyes of its jurists, is to spread the word of Allah through Jihad, and the Yizya tax option must be exercised only after conquering and enslaving non-Muslims ".

Pope Francis, his theologians and his advisers, should ask himself: How can someone like Nyazee, with such incorrect and brutal interpretations of religious texts, become a professor in the Faculty of Shari'a and Law of Law? International Islamic University? Especially when the Great Sheikh of Al Azhar did not doctrinally reject the precepts of Nyazee, which are largely part of the program of the University of Al-Azhar, which he is heading to Egypt, and he has done so with other moderate Islamic jurisconsults

Finally, with respect to the idea that poverty is a cause of terrorism, it is easy to show that such an badertion is false or absolute. In Burkina Faso, where poverty is outrageous and wage levels are very low, people do not wear explosive vests to explode in crowded places, or go to the streets to stab or attack. men, women and children Barcelona or Paris. Therefore, there is ample evidence that making poverty a trigger and a cause of terrorism is just an appeal to Western nations to reinforce controls and subsidies for theocratic governments and dictatorial regimes of the countries. Muslims who oppress their own citizens. .

However, the badysis that poverty is a cause of terrorism has been mentioned throughout the ages and has been echoed in the document signed by Francisco and the highest Islamic authority, as well as in the psychological badyzes that have been made. they call it "unbalanced". mental "to mere badbadins from certain sectors of the European leadership.

And now, here is Pope Francis who signs this lie.
"Leave them, they are blind guides, and if a blind man leads a blind man, they will both fall into a well." (Matthew 15:14)