RESIGNATION OF THE COMPLAINT | FORTE STRIKE TO OPERATION …

The cause of the protocol of agreement with Iran, initiated by the prosecutor Alberto Nisman a few days before his death, was hit hard yesterday. The AMIA asks DAIA to stop accusing Cristina Fernández de Kirchner and her government intervenes while the DAIA was already planning to take this step, which will be discussed at a meeting convened by its president on May 6 In this badembly, the PRO hawks in the DAIA are going to fight so that they do not give up on an accusation that collapses.

AMIA acknowledges in its letter that the memorandum is a political issue. "By renouncing this lawsuit against Senator Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, in addition to fixing a serious miscarriage of the previous administration, the DAIA will begin to stand out from a cause that is at the center of the famous crack that divides the majority of the Argentines, a division that certainly does not represent us. "In other words, it does not say whether the memorandum is a crime or not, but the cause is centered on the political crack, playing the prosecution in Change Evaluates' favor "the revision of this terrible foreign policy decision and its historical reversal correspond to the whole of the Argentine society and its representatives", indicates the text with reference to the agreement.

"We consider that the maintenance of this complaint is detrimental to the community in general and particularly affects the AMIA in its specific management," says the text. He adds that it is "imperative to strengthen the mechanisms to maintain the absolute independence of all the central bodies of the Jewish community of political parties or groups".

A surprising fact of the declaration, signed by the president of the AMIA, Agustín Zbar, is that it makes reference to the previous conduct of the DAIA as if it were foreign to him. The previous president of the DAIA was Ariel Cohen Sabban, who had to resign because of Esmeralda Miter's harbadment, but who was an ally of the United Religious Bloc, the mainstream Orthodox mainstream Zbar and led by Rabbi Samuel Levin. We see that now this orthodox religious current has changed in view.

From the first day, was the political manipulation caused by Nisman's complaint clear? The prosecutor felt that they were going to dismiss him from the AMIA taxation unit, particularly because he "traveled a lot and worked very little", as claimed by relatives of the victims, for request his dismissal. For Nisman, it was the decline of his power, the hidden money that accumulated -1,600,000 dollars, as it was recorded on his computer, his life of luxury and his career of dream until the handover market. To those in a hurry, he formulated the denunciation that was initially crushed by the judges and described in detail Daniel Rafecas the chief magistrate of the case. His decision was later confirmed by the Federal Chamber. The arguments were:

• The memorandum was approved by both houses of Congress.
• The power to sign a treaty corresponds – and corresponds – to the executive power.
• It was said that he favored the Iranian suspects but eventually Iran did not approve it
• It has never entered into force, so it does not have any legal effect.
• This pact would result in the lifting of warrants, accompanied by red warnings, Iranians. None of this has happened and Interpol Secretary General Ronald Noble of North America has denied that management has been set up to trigger the alerts.
• It was argued that the memorandum would lead to an exchange of Iranian oil for Argentine cereals. This has never happened In addition, Iranian oil can not be processed in Argentina due to excess sulfur.
• Some of the country's best known jurists, such as Raúl Zaffaroni, Leon Arslanian, Julio Maier and Ricardo Gil Lavedra, argued that it was a political and non-judicial cause.

Despite such an accumulation of realities, Comodoro Py's apparatus allowed the file to be continued and the Oral Court 8 was drawn to begin the process.

Along the way, DAIA leaders played an outrageous role. He joined two of the PRO activists in the whistleblowing for CFK and former Chancellor Timerman, who died today, through the intermediary of two family members of the victims of the crime. attack. The DAIA submitted a brief supporting the prosecution and, throughout the process, kept pace with the PRO hawks, MP Waldo Wolff, who was DAIA Vice President, and Minister Patricia Bullrich, by through her husband, Guillermo Yanco who was the owner of the Holocaust museum. Judge Claudio Bonadio agreed to everything, even though he did not even have to intervene. Then, Martin Irurzun charged him with a unified file.

Between AMIA and DAIA, there is a fierce intern. The AMIA is a mutual Jewish community whose main role is the badistance, education, culture, religious activity and the administration of cemeteries. The vote to choose the direction is direct of its partners and in all the last processes were elected presidents members of orthodox religious current. The DAIA gathers the institutions, synagogues and clubs of the community, with indirect vote since each badociated institution votes according to its number of partners. At the last meeting, there were 114 votes, including 83 for a list of a more open and less orthodox Judaism, who postulated Knoblovits. The orthodoxy, which led Zbar as a candidate, was far: 31 votes.

Today's hostile climate includes the astonishing fact that AMIA – which integrates and votes within the DAIA – wants to expel DAIA from Pasteur Building 633, where the DAIA has been active since the bombing. of 1994. fierce internal is the product of the desire of the AMIA and the orthodox current to monopolize the representation of the Jewish community in Argentina.

The concrete thing is that beyond disputes, both parties were about to take a step ahead of the charge against CFK. It was an open secret that even within the new direction of the DAIA, she was convinced that the memorandum was a governmental act and not a judicial one. At the time, Judge Rafecas argued that it could be said whether the treaty was good or bad, but it was not a crime as Nisman wanted it to be. Even less could be accused of treason towards the country, not being Argentina in a war. This accusation has been overturned by the Federal Chamber, but the proceedings for the trial are continuing due to concealment.