The Argentine dream | The voice

The country that looks terrified by the main protagonists of the electoral process who fight among the flames that devour it does not dream that "God is Argentinian" and that we are "doomed to success". But dream.

In this dream, Mauricio Macri does not threaten the "divine punishment" of the market with the "sin" of not having voted or attributing everything to the winner of the Paso; Alberto Fernández does not use his statements to turn the president into his own "Remes Lenicov", and Roberto Lavagna does not deny Luis Brandoni and Juan José Campanella having summoned the march last Saturday.

The Macri of Dream admits its responsibility in the dark fragility of the economy that exploded with the Paso, apologizes for its missed promises and its certainties denied by reality and pledges to stop the fighting between the flames to focus, purely and exclusively, agree with whoever to contain, however, the tears that society suffers.

At the same time, Alberto Fernández del Suedo discards him recommendations and temptations to contribute to the government burning a financial fire before the end of his term.

Fernandez, dreamlike, acts only as the Peronist candidate who had spoken a week before with wisdom and responsibility to calm the markets and cause collapse. Not the one who, a few days later, threw matches at the fuel that permeates the Argentine reality.

The one in the dream does not act like a raging boxer who hurls low on an opponent who is already struggling against the ropes. He also does not say that in Venezuela "there is no dictatorship, but an authoritarian government", nor does it support such a statement with outrageous arguments.

According to that of the nightmare, the definition of dictatorship has nothing to do with acts but with the origin. When he came to power through the polls, even though he committed the thousands of murders, tortures and disappearances that Michel Bachelet denounced to the UN, it was not a dictatorship, but an "authoritarian government". And, he adds, in Venezuela, "institutions work".

The one in the dream knows that the institutions are there, but they do not work. The Congress is here, but for there to be a republic, it has to act as a legislature, and that has not happened since Nicolás Maduro blocked his ability to legislate.

The supreme judges are there, but to function as a judiciary they have to be independent, which does not happen either.

That there are people talking in a hemicycle and others with a dress on a stand does not mean that the institutions of the republic work. To say the opposite, as Fernandez did with the nightmare, would not only show the continuity of the dark bonds of Kirchnerism with Caracas and the conditioning that Cristina can impose on her. It is also possible to interpret it as a sign of what might happen in your government.

In short, if what defines a government, it is the origin, not the acts, that Fernández is about to win an election (and without committing fraud like the one Maduro got to get his second term) give him an excuse to censor, harbad and harbad critics and opponents without feeling dictator.

In the Argentine dream, Alberto continues to argue over corruption, populism and authoritarianism, as he has done over the past decade. And next to him, there is a Macri who admits his failures, in addition to apologizing to half of the country that fears a return to aggressive sectarianism and a cult personality, not to s' be discarded so that the ruling party can have a more competitive candidate. that & # 39; it.

It's a Macri aware of the economic and social damages caused. And since we are, the dream president is a statesman with a political culture and energetic speech, who would never resort to slogans empty and without substance like "All together, we, the Argentineans, are unstoppable ".

In the country where the dazed Argentina dreamed of impoverishment and fear, Cristina recognizes that she has left an economy in a critical state and Macri admits to having aggravated it.

In this same unlikely scenario, Hernán Lacunza, Guillermo Nielsen and Lavagna, with the balance position between the free market and the heterodox pragmatism they demonstrate on the eve, share the economic conduction of the transition to avoid further damage. more serious.

It turns out that, dreaming, the country has hurt and scared dreams, things even more fanciful than the delirium in which "God is Argentinian" and "we are destined to success".