The best analysis of Oscars, by Santiago García

February 25, 2019

Lanata Sin Filtro filmmaker Santiago García said: "I think that"Green paper"It was the best of the eight nominees, but moviegoers attach more importance to those who take risks."

In edition 91 of Oscar Award, the movie with Viggo Mortensen – "Green paper"- he won the first prize and prevented the victory of the first Oscar-nominated Spanish film for best film -"Rome"- In turn, the film Cuarón obtained three statuettes.

"Green Paper has entered the big track of the awards season for reasons related to the ideological. It undoubtedly respects the manual of politically correct, good intentions and does not seem to make mistakes that place it in a controversial place. The movies are full of these films and if someone wants to win prizes today, he will probably get them in two ways: biographies of famous characters or actual events and / or defense of minorities who have been segregated or discriminated against in the past or in the past. present. Green Book is based on real events and contains the necessary ingredients of politically correct. The mistake is to believe that integrating at the time is necessarily a bad thing. Speculating with prices is not what an art can claim, it is clear. But what if, if we see the film, we do not see speculation or cinematic merit, then no claim is necessary. Green Book is nothing new, but the old looks very beautiful"He wrote Santiago Garcia a few weeks ago, when "Green paper"He went out to Argentina.

"I think "Green Paper" was the best of eight nominees. But moviegoers value more those who take risks", Reaffirmed Santiago García of London and in communication with Lanata Sin Filtro.

Santiago García criticized the premieres of the film this week: "Green Book", the film that can give an Oscar to Viggo Mortensen