The British Parliament rejected the holding of a second referendum on Brexit



[ad_1]

This was the first time parliamentarians had spoken on this issue, promoted by the vice-chair of the independent group Sarah Wollaston, and it was planned to include in this plebiscite the option of choosing to keep the country within from the community bloc.

The main campaigns defending this option, "People's Vote" and "Best for Britain", have disagreed with Parliament's statement on this issue, saying the timing was not appropriate.

The Labor Party did not support this amendment, citing the same arguments as the campaigns and despite the inclusion of the possibility of defending a second referendum on Brexit as an official policy.

The President of the House, John Bercow, was criticized for introducing this amendment and not another one, which claimed: reject a second referendum and wrap up the result of the celebration of June 23, 2016 that gave victory to Brexit, reported the EFE news agency.

This clause could have received the support of the wing of a larger number of Eurosceptic conservatives, as well as ten deputies of the Northern Ireland Unionist Democratic Party (DUP) and some Labor Party members. Opposed to a new vote.

The official motion presented by the government, to which will be added the previously approved amendments, indicates that the executive will request a three-month extension to the European Union if, on March 20, Parliament approved its agreement, reported the BBC.

Yes For the third time, MEPs reject this document, the government will request a longer delay, which the bloc of the EU must approve unanimously, which will force the United Kingdom to participate in the European elections from May 23 to 26.

.

[ad_2]
Source link