The Federal Chamber rejected Macri’s request and reactivated the case

Irurzun argued that Macri’s defense did not properly justify the alleged apprehension of bias and demanded that the case be moved forward.

After rejecting Boico’s separation, Irurzun warned that “Consequently, it will correspond to reactivate the course of the various incidents whose regular treatment has been suspended following the articulation of the proposals that the different parties (accuser and defense) have made, with the repercussion that this means in the delay of the solution of the outstanding questions ”.

Meanwhile, in a higher instance, the Federal Criminal Cassation Chamber refused to remove chambermaid Irurzun from the case.

Irurzun had been contested by the representatives of the plaintiff Fabián De Sousa. They alleged that the guarantee of the impartial judge had been affected on the ground that among the evidence in the case was the recording of a telephone conversation between the singer of the chambermaid and Fabián “Pepín” Rodríguez Simón, one of the main operators of the macrismo trying to be a refugee in Uruguay.

The lawyers Carlos beraldi Yes Ari Llernovoy, who represents De Sousa, demanded the removal of Irurzun citing an alleged relationship between the maid and Simón, accused in the case.

The complaint linked this contact to a journalistic note published on the portal “The rocket towards the moon” – which reported a meeting between them in a bar. In addition, it was recalled that Irurzun himself had been the victim of illegal espionage by macrismo.

These resolutions were issued in the case of the Fabián De Sousa complaint in which the persecution of the Indalo group is investigated through various resolutions against Oil Combustibles with which the Cambiemos government harassed companies and their shareholders. The case is dealt with at first instance by Judge María Servini who obtained numerous pieces of evidence which led her to request the capture of Simón.