The intimate contradictions of Alberto

Alberto Fernandez burst
Telenoche the Zen attitude he had practiced with journalism in exposing his camp that he would like to repress, at least during the campaign: that of his anger towards this more difficult sector of journalism with kirchnerism. An inner fury that dominates him from time to time (like the day he got angry with Mercedes Ninci, Jonatan Viale and a journalist from Mendoza because he did not like his questions), but he managed to contain in the previous days.
STEP.

But victory has strengthened it. That's why the TV show with Diego Leuco – who was asked to pose "pavadas" to him – did not seem to be dedicated to him alone, but to the whole antikirchnerista universe: "You – (you?) – he spoke only several months, leave to me ". During this visit, Graciana Peñafort, the lawyer for
Cristina Kirchner, could not contain himself and turned on Twitter: "What silly is Leuco
junior! The K Troop supported and amplified this insult in the networks and added, in line with the Telam K activists' stalk: "Go grab your" little things "because" we'll come back ". "Andalusia possesses the journalistic tuffillo of Conadep, as demanded by the most difficult sector of K. A risk that Alberto pledged to discredit, even with precise gestures, returned yesterday to Malba, to the occasion of an event organized by the group Clarín.

But what will he do if he gets the government to contain the vindictiveness of his own partners? In a recent interview with Nora Veiras at
Page 12He repeated an argument that could be his future scenario to appease Christianity: it is not worth the fight (the media) because "they do not convince anybody".

Alberto denied a breach during his tenure: "It's a ghost encouraged by the government," Chicaneó. However, it was he who willingly dropped default sentences by suggesting that Argentina renegotiate "one by one" with bondholders. His words overheated foreign financial markets and he was immediately forced to lie in front of Guillermo Nielsen, the most promoted economist on his team. But Alberto also has Emmanuel Álvarez Agis, with a thought closer to that of Kicillof. Which of these two economists, with very different paradigms, will be closer than Alberto really thinks?

Marcos Galperin, a member of the "Our Voice" discussion group (a business man from the Filomacrista conglomerate), was one of the first members of the economic establishment to visit the Mexico City bunker. In the LN + studies, Miguel Ángel Pichetto did not let the contradiction slip and, in chicano mode, he recommended to the CEO of Mercado Libre to better test the bridges with the Christian Juan Grabois who had it. destroyed in many public debates.

Justice is another area of ​​the contradictions of the Albertists and another unknown who may have already begun to be revealed this week. Alberto first stated that the judges would have to review their judgments when he became president. Then he denied it and ratified his wishes for an autonomous justice. However, yesterday, a high impact judgment appeared, the first, after the electoral victory of August 11: they canceled the prosecution of Julio De Vido in the case of the burial of Sarmiento. At the same time, the Federal Chamber rejected the closure of the Post case, which complicates the task of the Macri group. Will a "democratization" of justice come, as Cristina would like, or will the division of powers be maintained, as Alberto proclaims?

The church is another swampy territory. Part of the international press has attributed to the pope a share of responsibility in the overwhelming peronist triumph of the OSP. This week Alberto met with the ecclesiastical dome and had already gone to the Vatican to meet the pope. After this meeting, he confessed that Bergoglio had managed to "reconcile" with the Church. Fernández carries a little known karma: his parents separated during his childhood, at a time when the divorce was a stigma for these children raised in a society still strongly influenced by the values ​​of Catholicism. What will happen then with this tacit alliance if, at the request of Christianity, Alberto advocates the decriminalization of abortion?

The albertismo and the Christian campism constitute two contradictory cultural universes, with abyssal differences hardly concealed by the victory. Perhaps Alberto himself does not know how he will formulate them when he is elected president. This is perhaps why he is involved in so many speeches during a campaign in which he has no choice but to speak. Talk to two opposing worlds.

IN ADDITION