The judicial front of Cristina is more complicated than that of Menem in 2003 – 18/05/2019

After stating that she was not interested in becoming a legislator because the fueros were donated by the people and not by a post in early 2016, Cristina Kirchner was nominated as a candidate for the senator in 2017 which allowed him to avoid preventive prisons. that the Court rendered, including the one that it rendered firm in the case of Iran's concealment during the AMIA attack. Your judicial situation It is so complex that it has been dealt with in eleven court cases, five of which have already been subjected to an oral and public hearing., record that even former President Carlos Menem did not have when he was running for president in 2003.

It's no coincidence that presidential candidate Alberto Fernandez warned Wednesday with a threatening tone that "someday Ercolini, Bonadio, Irurzun, Hornos and Gemignani they will have to explain the barbasadas that they wrote to comply with the power of the day. "It is the judges who have most complicated the task of the Senate of the Citizen who had already advanced his decision, it was not a fury." This condition, up to now, defends the man from K Cristóbal López business.

Clarin Bulletins

What you need to know today | The most important news of the day to read in ten minutes

Monday to Friday morning.

Julian Ercolini is the judge who sued him and ordered an oral lawsuit in the case of the direction of public works in favor of the business group of Lázaro Báez. According to expert reports cited by Ercolini in an 800-page December 2016 decision, approximately $ 3,300 million worth of work was uncompleted and most were delivered in cartel format and with surcharges. that the majority of the Court wanted to stop, after an alleged "call to the ear" of Fernandez to one of its members. For the detailed prosecution, as alleged head of an illicit badociation, Cristina sits for the first time Tuesday in front of the court of the accused before the federal oral court 2 (TOF 2) and with his former officials such as Julio De Vido and José López, among others.

Claudio Bonadio he dealt with it in the cause of the pact with Iran, in the real estate Los Sauces, in the case of the future dollar and in the cause that most worries Cristina Kirchner: bribebooks. For this reason, he is the judge whom he most often challenges without success and is disqualified from all sorts of swearing, though he has never sought to refute the evidence gathered in public. In this case are gathered, in addition to the visits of Roberto Baratta's driver, Oscar Centeno, the confessions of former K officials such as José López and Claudio Uberti and his former accountant Víctor Manzanares. And that is why Cristina tries to disqualify her as a cause of "photocopies" whenever she can.

Another of the disqualified by Alberto Fernández was the cameraman Martín Irurzun who gave shape to the "doctrine" of the preventive prisons of former officials. This cameraman argued that former free leaders could destroy evidence or call witnesses on the basis of their power and money relations. In turn, the member of the Cbadation Chamber Juan Carlos Geminiani was who lobbied for the declaration of unconstitutionality of the pact with Iran, after a fierce attempt to disarm the same rostrumL and Gustavo Hornos – another judge of cbadation – was one of the many rejected resources of Cristina to end the Roads cause and others who built a complicated judicial front. The Association of Magistrates has firmly rejected the threat of the now presidential candidate and the constitutional expert Daniel Sabsay has asked him to apologize publicly to these judges.

Anyway, until the end of the year or the beginning of next year there will be no sentencing or exculpatory sentence in these cases because of the pace of trial and the right of defendants to the defense. But with the precedent of former President Carlos Menem, it took thirteen years for the case to be tried in the context of a case of illegal arms sales to the United States. Ecuador and Croatia. Even today, there is no definitive judgment. This is why Comodoro Py expects more than K., challenges and progress.

Until the end of the lawsuits, you can not know if Cristina is guilty or innocent. But she is accused of serious crimes such as conspiracy, money laundering, concealment and aggravated fraudulent administration. In the hypothetical case that would be found guilty of one of these crimes, the sentence would be more than three years and should serve a prison sentence unless continue to enjoy certain privileges. For this possible judicial future, judicial sources have linked the transfer of Cristina to Vice President Alberto Fernandez with speculation: Article 99, paragraph 5 of the Constitution provides that the President has the power to grant the leniency, but "do not contemplate self-indulgence."