Naaju Breaking News, Live Updates, Latest Headlines, Viral News, Top Stories, Trending Topics, Videos
[ad_1]
41 deadly victims and a tragedy whose details are beginning to be known. The plane of the Russian company Aeroflot landed on Sunday, May 5, caught in flames at the Moscow Sheremetyevo airport, from where he had taken off shortly before traveling to Murmansk, Russia. Over the past few days, different indications of what happened and Recently, a video showing the entire accident was published.
According to information provided by the local newspaper Kommserant, It all started when the lightning damaged the plane and forced the pilots to make an emergency landing. no possibility of using the "autopilot". But neither the captain nor his partner were willing to do it.
The lightning damaged the aircraft and forced the pilots to make an emergency landing. (Photo: AP)
An expert told the Russian newspaper that Captain Denis Evdokimov had never flown manually Sukhoi Superjet 100 in the so-called "direct mode", without using the "autopilot".
According to the testimonies of various Russian specialists, the pilots should not have had problems landing., much less cause the fire of the ship.
Captain Denis Evdokimov had never manually piloted the Sukhoi Superjet 100 in "live" mode. (Photo: EFE)
That's why the accident investigation leans in favor of "the error of the pilot" During the landing and the main Moscow experts, an "excessive dependence on autopilot" with regard to commercial flights is a problem that must be solved by the major airlines.
"It was the pilots themselves who dangerously accelerated the plane just before landing. and, on top of that, they plunged it. "It made the situation" critical ".
The aircraft of the company Aeroflot catches fire at the Moscow airport. (Twitter)
"Now the research seeks to establish which of the two pilots performed the dangerous maneuver that cost 41 lives", was affirmed by the Kommserant.
Autopilot systems they allow the procedures to be fully automated to land or partially control them. They can also be completely disabled, allowing the pilot to take full control.
Denis Evdokimov, it is claimed, was not well trained. (Photo: AP)
The so-called systems' Autoland & # 39; they guide the aircraft to the runway using the runway lines of the approved airports. Sheremetyevo Airport and Sukhoi Superjet 100 are equipped for fully automated landings.
But in this case it is thought that the pilot chose or was forced to land without the aid of the autopilot, a process in which Denis Evdokimov, it was said, was not well trained.
"I think this disaster is the consequence of a series of pilot errors that began from the moment lightning struck the plane," said one expert. (Photo: AP)
Vadim Lukashevich, aviation expert and former designer of the Sukhoi Design Bureau, said: "I think this disaster is the consequence of a series of pilots' mistakes it started from the moment when lightning struck the plane ".
"This caused problems but they were not critical. The decision to return was correct, " Lukashevich added. "But the pilots then had to remember that they were really pilots and that they had to fly the plane in the usual way for international aviation 40 years ago, without a pilot automatic."
"They were landing normally, with a glide path, but they lowered their nose and increased their speed before landing," said a specialist. (Photo: EFE)
"To my knowledge, Aircraft Commander Denis Evdokimov, who flew more than 1,400 hours aboard the SSJ-100, I had never landed in direct mode (totally manual). "
"They were landing normally, with a glide path, but they lowered their nose and increased their speed before landing. "Fortunately the front end has not broken. If that happened, the consequences would have been even worse. "
Source link
