[ad_1]
Oral jurisdiction will define the situation of Boudou and five other defendants
The trial of the Ciccone case, which could sentence former vice president Amado Boudou, will render his judgment next Thursday, July 12 the Center for Judicial Information
The schedule for the final stage of the oral trial includes Tuesday, July 10, the day of submission of the latest statements before the award.
Boudou is not only tried by the Federal Federal Court (TOF) Nº 4, integrated by Judges Pablo Bertuzzi, Néstor Costabel and Gabriela López Iñíguez. There will also be a resolution on the roles of José María Núñez Carmona, Nicolás Ciccone, Rafael Resnick Brenner, Alejandro Vandenbroele and Guido Forcieri.
The last allegation occurred yesterday, when Vandenbroele's defense, the only repentant of the Ciccone case, demanded that he be acquitted for playing the role of alleged Boudou attendant for the purchase of l & # 39; printing.
When it was his turn to testify in court, Vandenbroele held that the court cases related to the operation of The Old Fund with Ciccone were "a political decision". And he named Núñez Carmona, Boudou's friend, as the person who had warned him of the opportunity to do business with Ciccone, during an informal conversation at a Puerto Madero cafe.
Vandenbroele was the only one charged with repentant law, but not before TOF No. 4 (which must determine whether to dilute his charge of collaboration), but before Judge Ariel Lijo, as prescribed by the regulations.
However, the anti-corruption office, an organ constituted as an accuser, asked Vandenbroele a significantly lesser sentence, compared to the charge against other defendants, for his "contribution" confessions, which "corroborated the evidence that was produced during the debate". 19659006] Last week, Boudou accused his alleged henchman during a television interview: "Vandenbroele, unfortunately, is a person who plays the role of repentant, this new figure of Justi which is very doubtful. I rented an apartment in Puerto Madero.It is very different to say that I paid for the cable.This has nothing to do with a criminal trial, where the freedom of people is at stake. "
topics in this note
Did you like this note?
Source link