The unusual failure that requires him to support his ex-wife even though she remarried



[ad_1]

An exceptional case: forced a divorced man to continue to benefit his ex-wife from the pension, whether she remarried or not.


http://la100.cienradios.com/

A divorce case has become viral. In Catalonia, the authorities forced a man who had divorced to continue killing his ex wifeeven when she remarried.

The controversial decision, which contradicts the rule that at the time the beneficiary remarries "or lives" with another person, this pension will be canceled, based in this case on a private document drafted by the children of the marriage . and that the man signed freely at the time of the separation.

This document states that the ex-husband will take care of the pension even if the "civil situation" of the woman varies, and played a key role at the time when the court of A Coruña resolved the appeal formed by the 39; exconyúge to maintain this income. to your new link.

The discussion between the parties is based on the fact that the ex-husband insists that he did not know that by signing this text, he pledged to keep the pension before a future marriage. In addition, in a first sentence, the court explained why "the lack of definition of the document" the exempt from payment.

In the case of this new decision, to which ABC had access, the court also notes that "the wording could have been clearer and stricter". However, remember that those who submitted the document for signature were the "common children" of the couple and complained that "this testimony was not offered" when clarifying the purpose of the marriage. controversial agreement and its intention. of his editors, direct family of the complainant.

The role of children, determining

At this extreme, determining in the sentence, divorced defense argued that he thought that the agreement referred to another type of situation (case of illness or disability of his ex wife).

However, the woman's lawyer insists that the clause does not admit any other interpretation and recalls that the man has voluntarily contracted the "obligation", that the text of the even "is short and easy to understand" and that "the applicant is a person who can read and write." Also remember that the pensioner, aged 70, had this money for his survival when he decided, two years after the divorce, to remarry another person.

It was precisely when the man learned the marriage of his ex wife when he decided to withdraw the payment, on the basis of the legislation in force and without taking into account a letter that finally sentenced him.

Asked about the purpose of this private document, the woman revealed that she thought it was an act of generosity for the alleged ill-treatment in the past.

Separated parents: how to maintain good relationships for children?

[ad_2]
Source link