they accused him of being a chief instigator and the Viking said he wanted to testify against him

Trump first convinced his supporters that the election was a steal, then “stepped down from his role as commander-in-chief and became the chief instigator of a dangerous insurgency,” said lawmaker Jamie Raskin, the main voice of prosecutors in the process. .

“The evidence shows that he knew what was going to happen and that he was not at all surprised by the violence,” promised Raskin, for whom “when the violence broke out inexorably and inevitably” Trump “totally abdicated his homeworks”. .

The concepts were part of the adversarial argument against Trump in the second day of the process, after yesterday, some minor substantive issues and the central issue of whether the trial was constitutionally valid or not were resolved.

Still, the odds of a conviction appear slim, as Democrats must convince 17 Republican senators that the former president is guilty of the charge of incitement to insurgency.

“He welcomed this and did nothing to help us as commander-in-chief,” Raskin said., who insisted that the crowd “was sent here by the president, they were invited by the president of the United States.”

During the first day, one of the Capitol thieves said he was prepared to testify at the impeachment trial about how Trump’s words resonated with him, according to his lawyer. “He heard the president’s words. He believed them. He really believed him,” Jacob Chansley’s attorney Al Watkins told ABC News. “He thought the president was walking with him,” he added.

Ahead of the constitutionality vote, Republican Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana admitted to CNN that Democratic prosecutors had made a “very good opening, with very good arguments” on the matter and promised “to approach the process with a spirit. impartial jury. “

It will take another day for the Democratic House delegates to lay charges, unlike Trump’s first indictment last year over allegations of abuse of power, a process that took three weeks.

Once they have concluded, it will be the turn of the defense lawyers, who will at the same time have the opportunity to present their arguments as part of the process led by Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy (third in line with the presidential succession) .

The 100 senators who sit on the jury have up to four hours to ask questions.

The goal of the process in the Senate is to find Trump guilty and then organize another vote to disqualify him politically, but that chance seems unlikely, if you analyze the outcome of yesterday’s vote to settle constitutionality, when only 6 Republicans voted with Democrats.

If the former White House chief is convicted, in addition to being able to exclude him from another possible candidacy, it would be appropriate to receive Trump’s pension of around $ 221,000 a year, plus other benefits.

For the lawyers representing Trump, the trial is “a political instrumentalisation” that will “tear” the United States apart.

The mogul, who has been in Florida since leaving the White House on January 20, does not appear to appear and has so far kept silent about the process.

Trump is the first president in history to face two indictments and the first to be indicted after leaving the White House.

El equipo legal de Trump will consider that an expresidente no puede ser procesado y desestimó el juicio como “absurdo”, con el argumento, además, de que el discurso del entonces presidente el día de la toma del Capitolio está protegido constitucionalmente por el derecho a la freedom of speech.

But for Raskin, “to describe Trump as a guy on the streets who is being punished for his ideas is a false description of his actions.”

Although there is no suspense on the outcome, some surprises may still emerge, considering that the leader of the Republican minority, Mitch McConnell, would have asked his co-religionists to vote according to their conscience and not related to the party slogans.