Naaju Breaking News, Live Updates, Latest Headlines, Viral News, Top Stories, Trending Topics, Videos
[ad_1]
The judge of the National Court, María Tardón, lodged a complaint against the Argentinian player Lionel messi, his father Jorge Horacio Messi, his brother Rodrigo Messi and the foundation of the “10” for alleged accounting offenses, fraud, against the Public finances and money laundering.
The president of the central investigating court number 3 decreed the provisional dismissal in the absence of evidence of the crime at the end of a procedure carried out during a “particularly complex and exhaustive investigation” of almost two years .
All this following the complaint filed in June 2019 by former Foundation employee Federico Rettori, who ensured that Messi and his environment would have benefited from the foundation to receive personal payments that were not intended for any purpose. social security and thus get rid of paying taxes to the treasury.
In the letter, the magistrate stresses that despite these two years of investigation at the request of the prosecution, it was not possible to prove any relationship or working relationship between Rettori and the foundation. Moreover, he explains that from the documentation of the work of the Spanish and Argentinian entities, “it appears that in reality the complainant did not have a working relationship with the same”.
Regarding the crimes against the Public Treasury and money laundering denounced by Rettori, the magistrate explains that, as reported by the Public Prosecutor’s Office, “the use of bank accounts in which the true ultimate owner of the assets is hiding also did not no longer been proven. neither did we use concepts that did not correspond to reality ”.
Thus, Tardón maintains that the doctrine requires that the file be closed from the moment the commission of a criminal act is ruled out or because the commission of the crime which would have given rise to the formation of the cause or did not exist does not. appear not to be duly justified, if any, the reasons for indicting a particular person, thus avoiding an undue prolongation of the criminal proceedings.
.
[ad_2]
Source link
