Why a forensic expert claims that the body of Santiago Maldonado "was planted" in the Chubut River | News instantly from LAVOZ.com.ar

The criminal Enrique Prueger, who performed a new badysis on the autopsy of the corpse of Santiago Maldonado, badures that the body "was planted" in the waters of the Chubut River, an badumption that contradicts the conclusion of the 28 Experts who took part in the investigation

A few days after the disappearance of the artisan during a gendarmerie operation to protest Highway 40, Pruger refutes some of the consequences that the experts have achieved. Infobae

According to the specialist, Maldonado's body was not in the river for 78 days but was planted "by someone" a few hours or 10 days before it was found October 17th.

He bases his hypothesis on point 10 of the autopsy, which, according to him, was ignored by the 28 experts who participated in the task.

Pollen

Point 10 points to the discovery of pollen in clothing that According to biologist and paleologist Leticia Povilauskas in the autopsy document, the body was dressed at the time of discovery, which could not to be produced "from any point of view".

Different factors related to the current of water Pollen is easily removed from clothing, especially in waterproof nylon materials such as pants, "says the biologist in the report.

The specialist points out that in 20 or 30 days under water, the pollen grains should have disappeared from the clothes worn by the artisan.

The autopsy of Maldonado's body was brutal in the cause of death: drowning caused by hypothermia. The experts also signed that there was no sign that the body had been removed. However, there was no consensus as to the number of days the body remained under water: 53, 60 or 73 days

In addition to the presence of pollen in the clothes, the criminal Prueger returned to mention something that other specialists had already warned: the possibility of taking fingerprints.

"It erased the extended death data and could not exceed 30 days and even more fingerprints obtained and any author, even the The two arguments were insurmountable for the experts, because they could never conclude with more data of 70 days, "he says 19659010] Experience

Prueger badures that he performed an experiment in the Chubut River where he could verify that there were errors in the measurements of water temperature by the experts.

But also, he badures that he took the job of placing nearly a kilo of meat in the same place where the body of Maldonado was found for a person to watch week after week for weight changes.

The meat not only decomposed, but was also at the mercy of the "wildlife places, otters, ferrets, fish and crabs that l & # 39; 39, have literally devoured, "he said. 59013] According to Prueger

Of all these elements, there are two hypotheses retained by the criminal.

The first is that Maldonado "s drowned and his body was hidden somewhere before being thrown into the river to be discovered."

The second, that he was "imprisoned, hidden (though he had been hit once to wait for their blows to go away) and then drowned and placed there."

None of these possibilities is only envisaged in the official autopsy nor expressed by Judge Gustavo Lleral, who is in charge of the investigation.

PRUGER. He is a well-known criminal who has been involved in such famous cases as the murder of Private Omar Carrasco and the death of Carlos Menem Junior. He also worked in the case of Attorney Nisman