[ad_1]
In his lawsuit to block the grand jury subpoena, lawyers for Mr. Trump cited 2018 campaign statements by Attorney General Letitia James, Democrat, as being part of a “campaign to harass the President”.
They cited a statement, for example, in which she said Mr. Trump should be worried because “we’re all getting closer to him.”
Last year, Ms James’ office opened a civil fraud investigation into Mr Trump’s businesses. As recently as last month, Mr Trump’s son Eric, after months of delays, was questioned under oath by lawyers in the office.
Rebecca Roiphe, a former Manhattan assistant prosecutor who teaches legal ethics and criminal law at New York Law School, said Ms James’ earlier statements made it seem like there was some truth to the prosecution that the people who investigated M. with the least political advantage. “
The only way for Mr. Vance to avoid this perception, Professor Roiphe said, was “to have a strong case with overwhelming evidence, which will help convince the public that they hold the former president responsible for criminal acts.
Ms James, responding to criticism from Mr Trump last year, tweeted that her office “will follow the facts of any case, no matter where they lead.” She added: “Make no mistake: no one is above the law, not even the president.”
One thing seems likely: Defending against a white-collar investigation, even as a former president, will be difficult, stressful and disruptive for Mr. Trump, said Daniel R. Alonso, who was Mr. Vance’s senior deputy of 2010 to 2014 and who is now in private practice.
[ad_2]
Source link