[ad_1]
Very Busy CEO Photo: Mark Brake (Getty)
When you are immersed in the toxic sideshow that is the ongoing debate between Tesla bears and bulls, it's common to feel like any what happens with the automaker – production problems, the CEO calls without blinking someone a pedophile – can not be more stupid. But we may have just reached the stupid peak.
This week, CEO Elon Musk was absent from his supposedly "busy" schedule to personally call the employer of a bearish critic Tesla who writes about the company under a pseudonym, and threatened to sue him if he did not stop writing about the company. Here's the icing on the cake: the critic could work for an oil investor.
Last week, an (alleged) Tesla fan revealed the identity of Montana Skeptic, the pen and the Twitter name of a Tesla reviewer who blogs on the investment website Seeking Alpha. Skeptic has long been aware of the fact that it is a Tesla shorts – which means that it bet that the stock of the company is going to take a nose at some point. (It is unclear what effect Skeptic's comment had on Tesla's course.)
But when he turned out to be an employee of a company that apparently invested in oil companies, this naturally raised Tesla's suspicions. crossed. (In the little research I did, it looks like his employer lent money for a few projects with oil-related firms.) At first glance, it does not look like a primary facet of the company.)
I digress. The reason I'm talking about all this is that on Monday, Skeptic abruptly removed his Twitter account, leaving many of his supporters and shorts-in-arms wondering what happened.
An acquaintance, Chris Irons, a Tesla critic himself who runs a research company, shortly afterwards said that he heard from Skeptic himself, who revealed that he has voluntarily deleted his account after Elon Musk personally called his boss to complain. Really.
Guys – I'm out of myself and before you ask, it's not a joke – I just picked up the phone with Montana Skeptic. He told me that he voluntarily deleted his Twitter account after Elon Musk personally called his boss to complain. I asked Montana's permission to tweet this. $ TSLA
– Quoth the Raven (@QTRResearch) 23 July 2018
Received by phone Monday, Skeptical refused to comment. (Jalopnik does not name Skeptic because he started writing on Tesla under a pseudonym and was not accused of crimes or wrongdoing that would, in our view, justify doing so too.) 19659004] But Skeptic followed with a statement from his own Tuesday on what would have happened. And according to his story, Musk threatened to sue him if he did not stop blogging about the automaker.
Yesterday afternoon, the director of the family office in which I am employed received a communication from someone claiming to be Elon. Musk. Doubtful that Elon Musk could actually attempt to contact him, my employer asked one of my colleagues to investigate and respond
My colleague then spoke to Elon Musk by telephone (c & c). He was good). Mr. Musk complained to my colleague about my writing to Seeking Alpha and Twitter. Mr. Musk said that if I continued to write, he would hire a lawyer and sue me.
Skeptic wrote that he had offered "to stop immediately writing on Seeking Alpha and disable my Twitter account."Musk himself played with the fact that other automakers or Big Oil must have some sort of conspiracy against Tesla, the role of Skeptic will surely fuel the fire. Personally, I do not think it gives credibility in one way or in the other; In fact, someone who works for an oil investor can also find Tesla – who has acknowledged that his business has not run smoothly for a good part of the year – a troubling business for them. investors.
But the chaotic Tesla part of the automotive world does not have a gray area. The Tesla bulls regularly lose their head about very simple reports, just as it has become commonplace for Tesla shorts to unfoundedly accuses journalists of being chilly for the automaker because they have written something about the company that has nuances. That does not mean anything for one side or the other, but I will shout it anyway because it's possible to have mixed feelings about Tesla
That feared, but in an environment where neither of the sides of the Tesla Skeptic debate seems to have an interest in engaging with each other, it seems like it was unavoidable . I mean, it's the Internet. In 2018. It's crappy. Of course, someone would track down the identity of a fierce Tesla critic who operates under a pen name.
But the most important point that stands out from me is Musk's action here. Think about it. Musk is currently facing the wrath of Wall Street investors who want to know why he is still connected, gushing Twiter's tirades about anything, while increasing their anger because – at age 47 – he's making shit like a child -cooling hero a pedophile. He claims to be very busy, but he has time to call the bosses of his critics to complain about them? What other CEO would shit like that? Who knows, maybe Musk thinks it represents a kind of Big Oil conspiracy and that he is losing sleep.
Where did Musk get Skeptic's identity? The only logical explanation is that he relied on the investigation of a Tesla fanatic who was coming out of the Skeptic. The fact that he relied on that so that he could apparently pause before sleeping on the floor of the Tesla factory to call Skeptic's employer and threaten to sue him. is even more absurd.
I would just like to know why. Is it because he believes that Skeptic is part of a great oil conspiracy against electric vehicles? Or is he just trying to protect his price from the action? If that's it, then why Montana Skeptic? There is a sea of Tesla reviews, and Musk knows that they all exist. And yet, he apparently decided to get this guy out. It's weird!
Tesla would not shed light on the situation and whether Musk regularly took the time to call his critic's employers. He will not comment either whether Musk took the reasonable step of threatening to sue Skeptic.
"We will refuse to comment," said a spokesman for Tesla, "thank you."
Updated: should be noted Montana Skeptic was among the chorus of people who criticized the Wall Street Journal writer Dan Neil during a Tesla Model 3 story during of the weekend, leading Neil to delete Twitter.
[ad_2]
Source link
