[ad_1]
Emerging technologies have the potential to greatly affect fundamental human rights and governments must step in to regulate their use, said the Australian expert of the artificial intelligence Toby Walsh
. This major three-year project aims to develop an action plan so that Australia can ensure that new technologies such as artificial intelligence, big data and machine learning respect the human rights and do not damage them.
Mr. Walsh, Director of NACLC Policy, Amanda Beaford, President of the NACLC, Judge Beazley, President of NSW, and Alan Finkel, Chief Scientist
Professor Walsh stated that it was important to study new technologies. "Technology raises interesting ethical challenges and can affect things as fundamental as our basic human rights. I hope that human rights will be strengthened, and we will ensure that technology improves our living conditions, "said Professor Walsh at InnovationAus.com
" We are beginning to see that technology has a significant impact on human rights. the terms of algorithms are not fair, privacy, surveillance and all the other concerns that people are starting to have. We have the conversation just in time, or maybe a little late. "
Commissioner for Human Rights Edward Santow said that these new technologies have the potential to be either greatly beneficial or highly damaging to the general public.
Developments promise to d & # 39; But the scope and pace of change also pose serious challenges: technology should exist to serve humanity. "As new technology is reshaping our world, we must seize the opportunities this presents for Advance human rights by making Australia more just and equitable. more inclusive, "he said. "However, we must also be aware of the threat that new technologies could aggravate inequality and disadvantage." The project will explore the rapid rise of new technologies and what it means for our human rights. "[19659002] Professor Walsh said that he had a" half full glbad "approach to the potential of these new technologies to improve people's lives, if they are implemented and regulated properly.
"They can improve the flow of information." We have seen fine examples in the world of citizens who have benefited from the use of technology – there are many things that we can get technology and negotiation.
The Human Rights Commission report will likely recommend a series of new regulations that the federal government should consider, including efforts to reduce discrimination in the use of arti "It is clear, According to the discussions, the government has a role to play in improving regulations. We can not let technology companies play. We gave them a long piece of rope and we discover that all the disturbances are not good, and that some of them will aggravate the life, "said Professor Walsh
. these technologies interact with human rights and best address these issues, and then develop a "practical and innovative road map for reform".
"Human rights must shape the future – we must seize the opportunities presented by technology, but also guard against threats to our rights and entrenched inequalities and disadvantages" , said Mr. Santow
.As artificial intelligence can discriminate against people in society.
The Commission released this week a discussion paper for the project, and is now accepting public submissions on the questions in question
A discussion paper will be published
A final report containing a series of recommendations will be presented by the end of next year, and its implementation will begin in 2020
"Like any tool, technology can be used for good or for bad. . However, modern technology carries unprecedented potential on an individual and global scale, "said the Issues Paper.
"New technologies are already radically disrupting our social, governmental and economic systems. Often the same technology, or similar technology, can be used to help and harm. "The Human Rights Commission said the project would look specifically at the impact of new technologies on the human right to privacy, security, security, the right to privacy. to life and the right to non-discrimination
He would also look at the use of artificial intelligence to make important decisions without human supervision.
Professor Walsh was a Global voice on this issue.The recent signing of a commitment of thousands of AI researchers against killer robots.
Along with other signatories including SpaceX founder Elon Musk and Google's co-founder DeepMind, the group stated that they would refuse to participate in the development or manufacture of robots capable of identifying and attacking people without any human control.
Chief Scientist Alan Finkel spoke at the # 39, a conference in Sydney this week to launch the Human Rights Project, saying that Australia has an important role to play in ensuring the ethical deployment of new technologies.
"The way in which we integrate AI in our societies will be determined by the choices we make here, governments decide how companies are allowed to use the data, and governments decide how to invest public funds in the development of AI, "said Dr. Finkel.
"Governments decide how they want to control the AI, the police, health, education and social security – and that means nations like Australia have choices," he said. he said.
"We are capable technological innovators, but we have always imported more technology than we are developing." But that does not mean that we have to accept the future that give us companies in China, Europe or the United States.
"We can define our own future by being leaders in the field of ethics. And that is my aspiration for the 39: Australia: Being human guardians. "
It comes as the regulation of artificial intelligence has become a" live political issue "with many leading experts calling the Australian government to put itself at the foot of the wall . 19659002] The federal government allocated $ 30 million to this year's budget for the development of an ethics roadmap, while a number of unions advocated a further regulation of driverless vehicles
. for governments to regulate the use of facial recognition technology to address "social ramifications and risks of abuse".
The General Data Protection Regulation of the European Union is an example of the impact that effective regulation can have on a region of the world. From other countries, said Professor Walsh.
"Australia now has better data protection because of European legislation It is interesting to see how things that happen in the world can have a positive impact.People are now much more aware of data privacy and we now have much better data privacy, "he said.
Source link
