[ad_1]
The radical changes in governance proposed for the Australian Football Federation by a FIFA-supported task force seem to have to come at the first hurdle.
Tuesday is the deadline for the eight-member congress review working group to submit their document to the global governing body on how the FFA's membership should be expanded to comply FIFA's statutes. However, AAP understands that a furious lobbying by FFA has ensured that the changes to the working group are blocked when they are put to a vote.
An amendment to the FFA Constitution is required to pbad the changes, which means that 75% of the current 10-member congress must vote in favor.
FFA has convinced Capital Football and the Northern Territory Football Federation to vote against, and they are supposed to be supported by at least one other state federation.
These three votes are enough to block the changes.
The position of FFA, and that of the state federations in their corner, is that the recommendation of the working group Les ns would tip the balance of power too much in favor of the A-League clubs, putting at risk the currently allocated to grbadroots football and national youth teams.
FFA is also unhappy that the structure of the Congress Working Group does not take into account the views of state federations that do not belong to FFA.
The clubs think that they generate the majority of FFA revenues and are therefore entitled to a larger share of it.
FIFA had the opportunity to sack President Steven Lowy and the FFA board of directors and replace him with a "standardization committee" in November 2017, when the last deadline for the change of governance has not been respected.
He instead chose to establish the working group on the review of congresses in a desperate attempt to force a diplomatic solution.
While now he is doomed to failure, the big question is what FIFA will do. ext. Standardization seems to be his only remaining option, but this could be achieved with a potential legal action of FFA.
FIFA did not respond to a request for comment from the AAP on Tuesday, nor did the presidents of Capital Football and FFNT.
The irony is that the latest skirmishes occurred at a time when the collaboration between the FFA and the clubs is
Other working groups have been formed and are working cordially to discuss topics such as that brand players, a new collective agreement for players and the feasibility of a second national division.
But while executives on both sides may be on good terms, Lowy's relationship with club owners in Ligue A remains tense.
[ad_2]
Source link
