[ad_1]
Scott Morrison tried to give up his previous voluntary support for the national energy guarantee by suggesting that the Neg is not a Coalition measure if its emission reduction target was 45%.
On Wednesday, at question time, the Labor Party asked the Prime Minister whether he agreed with his own previous badessments that the Neg had obtained lower electricity prices.
Morrison attempted to reposition himself, claiming that there was a "false statement" on the part of the Labor Party that the bargaining would be a measure of the coalition because the government had never proposed any action. emission reduction target of 45%.
"In the proposal examined by the government, the goal of reducing emissions was 26% – not 45%," Morrison told Parliament. "The Labor Party can not use the national energy guarantee as a sort of Trojan horse to legislate in order to reduce emissions by 45%, Mr. President."
Morrison said the Labor Party was engaged in a "tricky and fanciful lie".
Malcolm Turnbull and the then Minister of Energy, Josh Frydenberg, developed the National Energy Guarantee. This guarantee had been sold enthusiastically by other members of the government, including Morrison, then treasurer.
The mechanism was supposed to aim for a 26% reduction in electricity emissions, but Energy Security Commission officials have repeatedly stated that one of the central elements of the policy was the scalability of emission reduction target, including in their final design. advice to governments on the scheme.
"The guarantee mechanism ensures that the electricity sector contributes to the emission reduction commitments made by Australia in Paris, but especially that it can support different levels of hours." additional, "said BSE President Kerry Schott in August.
"The Australian government may set more ambitious targets for reducing emissions in the future," the council said. "In this case, the mechanism and the warranty framework will automatically adapt to the new goals."
In addition to the systematic advice that the goal was scalable, Frydenberg also agreed to revisit the goal of 26% after five years as part of his negotiations with the states, waiving the badumption that he was not the only one in the world. it was stuck for a decade.
Turnbull abandoned the Neg's emissions-reducing component at the end of August in an attempt to prevent a conservative push against his leadership, and Morrison formally dropped the emissions component with a decision from the Cabinet shortly after his accession to the post of Prime Minister.
The government's decision to abandon the negotiating framework has been widely criticized by stakeholders, who see this mechanism as the only viable option for resolving the climate and energy wars of the decade.
This week, former Deputy Liberal Leader, Julie Bishop, called for the rebirth of the Neg. She said the government should consider an energy policy "through the prism of concluding a bipartisan agreement with the Labor Party, in order to establish a stable and long-term regulatory framework that would support the investments of the country." private sector in production capacity ".
"Producers need long-term certainty to give them the confidence they need to make large-scale capital investments that will provide affordable, reliable energy with the right level of performance," Bishop said. .
Unions have attempted to resurrect the Neg, which continues to enjoy broad support from the energy and business sectors.
Bill Shorten unveiled last Thursday the restart of the opposition's energy policy, reiterating an invitation to the coalition to apply the mechanism it had abandoned during the implosion of leadership, but it also presented a detailed alternative to case where the bipartisanship discourse is finally rejected.
For months, the Labor Party has made it clear that if it wins the next federal election and continues negotiations, the goal would be more ambitious than that of the government, because the opinion was to reduce by 26% the first two years from the program.
Source link
