[ad_1]
Update
November 29, 2018 06:48:11
Revelations that taxpayers paid the $ 60,000 bill for the defense of MP Adam Brooks sparked public disdain, with President Sue Hickey demanding an explanation from Premier Will Hodgman.
On the night of Wednesday to Friday, Mr. Hodgman revealed that the government had compensated Mr. Brooks for legal costs incurred by the Integrity Commission, which had investigated the use of a drug. Professional email account while he was Minister of Mines.
Who is Adam Brooks?
- Born in Devonport, 1975
- Elected MP for Braddon in 2010
- Former Royal Australian Navy Electrician and Consultant to the Mining Industry
- First resignation of the ministry in June 2016 following the email scandal
- Said that he recognized "after thinking, there are things that I could have managed better"
A report of the Integrity Commission tabled on Tuesday indicated that Mr. Brooks had not violated the ministerial code of conduct or a significant conflict of interest, but had held the prime minister in office. Ignorance of his ongoing operational involvement in his mining software company e-mails that he deleted because he thought that they could be politically damaging
To date, Mr. Brooks has been reimbursed $ 57,888 in legal fees. Mr. Hodgman said, "I am told that additional fees are to be paid."
On Wednesday night, Sue Hickey, Liberal MP for Denison, president of the Tasmanian Legislative Assembly, said she was shocked by the late-night revelations and did not see how the payment could be justified.
"I will ask the Prime Minister for a meeting and an explanation please, because I do not think that any member of the public would understand why the government would pay legal fees in these circumstances," Ms. Hickey.
"I simply can not justify how the attorney fees were paid under the circumstances that were revealed."
The revelations were not well received on ABC Hobart's Facebook page, as some members of the public suggested sending their own bills to the Prime Minister, in the hope that taxpayers will bear the costs. .
Reg Ashman said: "A shame, but exactly what we expect."
Sam Webster commented, "Why not, when you know you can get away with it".
Comparisons were also made with the ongoing struggle between the government and the unions over the current public sector wage proposal, which has led Tasmanian teachers to repeatedly strike.
Labor MP Scott Bacon said the settlement of Brooks' tax bill by taxpayers was a "shame".
"It's a prime minister who's out of control, who can not keep his ministers in line, and then, when they lie to Tasmania's face and people, they have to pay for the fun," said M Bacon.
"And the taxpayer must pay for the pleasure, Madam President." It's a shame. "
On Monday, Mr. Brooks had posted on his official Facebook page that he had been "cleared of all allegations relating to the management of conflict of interest matters", his update having received almost unanimous support. .
One supporter described the case as a "political scoring exercise", another claiming that "you went to the factory and exited the factory".
"The truth wins in the end," commented the commentator.
Mr. Hodgman stated that he had asked the Solicitor General to review the payment and the additional invoices to determine if compensation should be paid.
He said that the government would disclose all costs once this notice was received.
Topics:
Government and politics,
political parties,
law-crime-and-justice
Devonport-7310
First posted
29 November 2018 05:29:15
Source link
