[ad_1]
By Annette Becker, Düsseldorf "The ideas of a misunderstood tradition should not prevent us from finding new ways. Who calls the site of the Krupp Foundation, is greeted with this motto of the founder Alfried Krupp von Bohlen and Halbach. At Thyssenkrupp, where the foundation still holds a 21% stake, the role of the foundation has always been understood differently, namely as a guarantor. According to the law, the law stipulates that "the unity of the company should be preserved as much as possible and its development should be encouraged," he says. A reflexive reference is made to Berthold Beitz, who, as head of the Krupp Foundation, has always affirmed his influence in the group and pulled strings behind the scenes. It is Beitz who, with the death of Alfried Krupp in 1967, becomes the first executor. He transferred Krupp's badets to the non-profit organization Alfried Krupp von Bohlen and to the Halbach Foundation, which began work on 1 January 1968. Almost legendary was his intervention in 2009, when there had been a dispute between the Management Board and the employees on the planned restructuring of the Group. As the honorary chairman of the supervisory board, Beitz summoned the participants without further delay in Villa Hgel and mediated the conflict. In the end, all parties engaged in the "Essen Declaration" on a confident cooperation in the reorganization of the company. In addition to the current Foundation Director, Ursula Gather Beitz no. has never been confronted with the charge of overflight. On the contrary, the "Ruhr Baron" was considered as an institution that had the last word in ThyssenKrupp, despite the requirements of the law on joint stock companies. His decisions have never been called into question, but on the contrary, the situation has deteriorated since the surprise retirement of Heinrich Hiesinger from Thyssenkrupp management a week and a half ago. In an open letter, the staff of the director of the Foundation accused "of having failed" in his main mission of preserving the legacy of Alfried Krupp. It was followed by the union with the union and the commitment, in the future, the obligation of the founder, the company unit as possible, to s & # 39; engage. But it was not enough for pacification. With the resignation of Ulrich Lehner from the supervisory board, Gather was even justified in denying the fact that he was the chairman of the supervisory board of Thyssenkrupp.
[ad_2]
Source link
