[ad_1]
Leave Özil at home? Bierhoff puts the player on the pillory – and makes worse the picture that the DFB is doing in the Erdoğan affair. Follow up at the most impossible time.
Comment by Martin Schneider Kazan
Oliver Bierhoff is a professional and visual artist. When he gives an interview in a newspaper, it works like this: he talks to reporters and rereads the statements before publication. So Oliver Bierhoff reviewed each sentence in the interview with the newspaper Die Welt . Also this pbadage: "We have never forced the players of the German national team to do anything, but we have always tried to convince them for one thing:" We have not managed with Mesut. "And so we should have wondered if we are athletic dispensed." Read and Approved.
Incidentally, there are also phrases in the interview. "But now we will not be the only player or pillory "Or," But it's not to interpret some culprits. "One wants to ask him desperately: Yes, what now?
Bierhoff puts Özil on the pillory
If Oliver Bierhoff in an interview nine days after the World Cup in an interview Özil appointment in question, so he just makes that chooses a culprit, he puts a player on the pillory and thus gives a scapegoat to all those who absolutely want to see Özil the cause of German failure, he puts him alone in a storm where racial bursts came to criticize the photos of Özil Erdoğan.Acting now in this situation, acts as a bad fault, a follow-up at the most impossible moment .
Bierhoff admits errors in handling the Erdoğan affair [19659009] The director of the national team commented Özil and Gündoğan. He says, "We should have thought about refraining from sport on Özil."
more …
Özil does not have to be accused of being more athletic than the rest of the team. A team, which incidentally also Bierhoff belongs, who had chosen the headquarters of the unloved team at Watutinki also with the argument that you have it from there not far for the semifinals and the finals. Would Özil now say in an interview: "In this respect, we should have thought that we give up the Bierhoff organization?" No, Özil is a player, Bierhoff responsible. Here it is the strong against the weak. Against the one who must now think that the whole world is against him. Including his own people.
This is the last chapter of a devastating manipulation of the DFB with the photos of Mesut Özil and Ílkay Gündoğan with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Little has been clarified, many have given their opinion for the better, and the debate is now completely poisoned. And Bierhoff adds to the confusion, he says in the interview also the sentence, it must "remember that Mesut could not what he was waiting for, for some obvious reasons and so could not the say."
Obviously, the reasons are not why Özil is silent until today and Gündoğan spoke, but the crucial question remained silent: How do you like Erdoğan?
What an ugly figure, Mr. Bierhoff! "
According to statements by the director of the DFB hailed in the criticism of the network, even opponents Özil perceive Bierhoff's behavior as an unsportsmanlike successor.
more …
now
A very bad impression – multilevel
Özil could not say anything because he feared disadvantages for family members under the regime autocratic Erdoğan? But what about protecting yourself from the player? Or could Özil say nothing because he finds the Erdoğan methods and politician rather good? So many would have lied to the DFB when they said the player did not want to send a political message. Instead, the DFB should have stood before the World Cup and said: we can not take players who support a political system in which opposition figures and journalists end up in prison en mbade . That would have been a clear solution.
Instead, the DFB searched. And now, on many levels, a very bad impression is created. If Özil had no future in the national team, why not announce it at a press conference, with all the background that led to that decision and a clear commitment to racism that Özil is now exposed to? Instead, Bierhoff pushes the player with nebulous allusions and lets the dynamics of the audience work. Perhaps he also hopes that Özil reads these phrases during his holidays, feels undesirable and resolves the problem for the DFB by resigning. In fact, one can hardly imagine how Özil could still end up in a stadium in Germany with the eagle on the jersey, without drowning in a whistling concert.
the reality escapes
The world of football is reorganizing at the World Cup – without Germany. The DFB is now required to abolish the old privileges.
Commentary by Thomas Kistner
more …
Source link
